Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:User tracking killed the newspaper (Score 2) 81

It's common wisdom that the data gathered through user tracking is valuable, but I'm not convinced it's true. Most of the numbers compare prices from the same ad network, for example they compare what you get for tracked Facebook ads vs untracked Facebook ads. But Facebook has an incentive to push tracking because that's how they differentiate themselves from other ad networks, so it makes sense they would underpay for untracked ads. The reason I believe that is because there's a massive market that is now killing online news sites and is actively moving away from tracking ads: video. There's no ethical reason to do so, Youtube is owned by Google so users are getting tracked anyway, the only reason vloggers are moving to sponsorships instead of Google ads is because it makes more money.

Comment Paranioa (Score 2) 60

Hardware generators that measure physical processes like electronic noise can't prove their randomness wasn't somehow predetermined or tampered with.

I never understood paranoid people like that. So you don't trust the RNG in your CPU but you trust that the rest of the CPU isn't compromised? If Intel/AMD are putting backdoors in their chips it's game over, no amount of quantum wizardry is going to save you.

Comment Re:"soon-to-be-insecure"... (Score 1) 125

I had the same Win7 install running all the way back from 2009 (Win7 had a feature for easy migration to new machines without having to reinstall). During that time, I never had any issue with malware. A month after support was dropped, my machine got infected by a pretty nasty one. I restored from a cold backup, but after a couple months it happened again. At that point, I realized that there were probably a bunch of jokers sitting on 0days waiting for the support to drop. I'm pretty sure they are doing the same thing right now with Win10.

Comment Rust is in perpetual beta (Score 2) 82

I actually like the idea of Rust, I always thought that we really need a modern low level C replacement, something like what Ada tried to be just not shit and based on RAII principles, and Rust is pretty much that. But it has no place in the kernel. The problem is that even though Rust was made by Mozilla, it feels more like a Google product, it's a programming language that is in perpetual beta. I remember the outcry when Python 3 broke backwards compatibility, and how it took 15 years to get everybody to migrate, even though it was managed very well from Python's part. When Perl 6 broke compatibility, they had to admit defeat and fork a new language because people refused to migrate. Yet the same people who were constantly bitching about it are now embracing Rust, a language that breaks backwards compatibility every other year. I understand that sometimes you need change otherwise you will end up with the unholy mess that is C++, but there has to be middle ground. Rust shouldn't be let near the kernel until it becomes a stable language.

Slashdot Top Deals

Our OS who art in CPU, UNIX be thy name. Thy programs run, thy syscalls done, In kernel as it is in user!

Working...