Its clear from the this post that you've had absolutely no first aid training whatsoever. Even someone trained in basic first aid getting there a couple of seconds faster can save lives, security will call the emergency services and guide them to the correct location. If they are remotely competent they will do this faster then you can, whilst allowing you to provide first aid to the person.
If you have three other people with you that is the only time you should consider calling security and an ambulance, and you should call security as the first priority. (One person for first aid - priority one, one person to get better trained people, AEDs, etc and also allow the ambulance access to the site -- priority two, one person to call emergency services directly - probably unneeded but better safe then sorry)

And I bet you continued to talk with them whilst they dispatched the unit? This delays first responders from getting to the scene. In a case like this CPR or AED is the most important thing even if it is applied inexpertly. You want the first aid trained people there as soon as possible and that's going to be security.

Security are also going to be able to remove bollards, open gates, etc to give the ambulance access to the building. They will know if there are special teams need for this response (i.e are dangerous chemicals involved) and be able to tell the emergency opperator to dispatch those teams. They will have procedures in place with the ambulance service for how to get access to the campus, etc.

Yep, Telstra is notorious for losing customer data. I give it 12months from when they actually get it working until someone publishes the whole thing, the biggest technical difficulty would be finding somewhere to host the dump.
That being said the law does require the data to be 'encrypted', which seems kinda stupid if they have thousands of systems writing to this database (which I assume they will if they are logging this amount of data). Just shows how the people who wrote the legislation had no understanding of what they where legislating.

I personally find Inkscape has a lot of missing features compared to illustrator (Although I do use it because I don't have an illustrator licence at home).

Which is why most android phones require you to enable usb data access every time you connect.

PCIE cards are a tad more complicated to install then thunderbolt devices... (and more scary for the average user)

Most ereaders aren't backlit

If you want an example of real sexism, this part of your post is. It is also incorrect in my experience, some of the best programmers I know are female.

In regard to you point about targeting one particular gender group as being sexist, unfortunately society divides us at a very young age and you need to appeal to kids interests to get them involved. I'm sure there is equally as many (probably more) male targeted programming courses.

It is possible to mathematically vertifiy code (see l4, its expensive and time consuming. But for something like this it would make sense to do it once and do it right.

Whilst that is true, I don't have any say in how the software is setup and have to use it. I'm sure this is the case for many people, so it definitely is a strike against companies implementing reject or spam responses to spf.

It breaks a few mailing (discussion, not advertising) list programs (such as my uni's one) if you send from a SPF protected address because the list server forwards it with you address in the from boxs. Other then that it works well.

Great man therefore traitor to status quo != traitor to status quo therefore great man.

Because ubuntu dosen't allow new major versions to be added to a distro that has already been released.

heartbleed wasn't a bash exploit, and had nothing to do with the shell you used. The majority of linux distros had /bin/bash as their default shell.

Providing service in network blackspots comes to mind straight away (for a price of course)