X-10 didn't exist until 1999 - that's 27 years for you.
Over 35 years my fucking ass.
Do a little research...Radio Shack had this in the 80s.
https://ancillary-proxy.atarimworker.io?url=https%3A%2F%2Fen.wikipedia.org%2Fwiki%2F...
Hate to tell you this, but Mark Sanford was/is from South Carolina. (I know...it is hard for some people to realize there are *two* Carolinas!). That is the same state that gave us Strom Thurmond. I'll let you look that one up.
The only Sanford we have had in North Carolina as a governor was Terry Sanford. He was a fairly progressive liberal Democrat who also served as a U.S. Senator.
As for that billboard you keep linking to, remember the KKK has had its claws in a *lot* of states over the years. Indiana was once known as the state ran by the KKK. And as for racism, you might look into the institutional racism in Hollywood and New York before the Civil Rights Act.
As for these buffoons in Woodland, there is a zoning and NIMBY pushback all over the eastern portion of the state, as solar companies are persuading many landowners to lease/sell land to build them. I don't have a problem with the farms, but I'm also not in a position to give away my land and home for it.
A) Using a product by someone you don't like has exactly nothing to do with protesting the appointment to CEO of someone you don't like. Eich didn't invent Firefox, and he has a negligible influence on the current state of Javascript.
B) Still using ReiserFS? The file-system left in unstable and pretty much abandoned development years ago because its main contributor is in prison? Are you high?
The only relation between these two persons is that they brought out the very stupidest of Slashdot readers in their defense.
You think you see my point? My point is that almost every single person has opinions and has supported causes that, if brought to light, would disqualify them from running *any* company. You want a litmus test?
No, I don't know you, or anyone specifically, but if you think you are without sin, you're full of it!
As for Eich's current involvement with Firefox or Javascript, if he wouldn't have had any influence on the direction of Mozilla, then what was the big deal? Because he didn't pass *today's* litmus test? What next? He didn't save a kitten from drowning? PETA/ADL would have a field day with that one!
All of you fucking PC idiots can go to hell.
Umm...Slashdot is now open to the highest bidder?
Maybe the editors need to vet the submissions better.
Might want to research intermittent wipers http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Kearns
So you're saying that this is more like rape than like seduction?
Now, now, now...You said you liked it last time...
Even if it is made public, it has to be declassified under proper authority to legally be declassified. And if it still has valid security implications, it can remain classified. Which means certain people can't legally discuss it, much less process it on their non-classified machinery, while others will openly discuss it.
Leaving in the names of people who are still in danger is a clear violation of law even when properly declassifying information.
If I get you right, you are quoting LEGAL language, not MORAL language
At any rate, none of this information has been declassified by the proper authority, so all of it is still legally considered classified, and anyone accessing it is liable to be charged with a crime.
Which brings up the simple question of moral relativism.
I agree. but not for Wikileaks, because...
Well, we all do, in the end, but for some of us the blood comes with moral authority and a lack of criminal guilt.
You, my friend have just equated morality with legality, and that is why, for the most part, our government has lost all standing to criticize or prosecute Wikileaks. The fact that you have been indoctrinated this much is why Jefferson is probably turning over in his grave.
The bogosity meter just pegged.