If all you're doing with a NAS is backups, you're wasting it, stick with multiple USB drives with a 3-2-1 strategy.
But most NAS users are sharing files, running containers for home automation and plethora of other interesting uses, backup just being one of them
...disgruntled customers of his Mar-A-Lago document selling operation unhappy with the product they got?
... in which humans don't make content fast enough or obediently enough for the rent-seeking ownership class of brand, copywrite, franchise or other IP who want to monetize without effort or risk.
Being a limited consumer, not creator product is a feature, not a bug as far as Apple is concerned.
If you made iPad sufficiently attractive that it could replace the Mac which Apple thinks you should also own, that would be a bad thing for the fruit company. Similarly, Macs are denied foldover screens, touch screens and tablet modes to prevent you from getting the idea that you don't need an iPad too.
Apple may be the only company that could sustainably support that arrogance.
...into their cloud whether you like it or not.
Well yeah, New Sheppard is a joke, but a working New Glenn would make them a clear, if somewhat distant #2 to SpaceX
Doesn't matter what Musk fanboys who love his current dementedness think or not.
SpaceX is currently, capably managed by COO Gwynne Shotwell -but due to a series of brilliant decisions Musk made some time ago is frankly, clearly so far ahead of every other old space, new space and national space programs it's not even debatable.
I don't understand what exactly people who are mad that SpaceX essentially has a near monopoly on cost-effective space flight think or want. SpaceX got there by taking huge risks, mostly with it's own investors money (NASA never paid SpaceX a dime to develop landing/reuse) creating "launch as a service" when everybody else just wanted to sell "buy our throwaway rocket and launch combo from us". International space industry is full of lazy, greedy rent-seeking behemoths like Boeing or bureaucratically paralyzed govt programs and SpaceX is a breath of fresh air -no matter how much we may or may not hate the asshole Elon.
I predict the much more capable and economical Starship will be landing it's Super Heavy 1st stage booster long before New Glenn does. It already did the controlled descent into the Gulf on Flight 4, just have to get the chopsticks to grab it on a pad landing -which is going to be extremely hairy.
New Glenn is supposed to be able to do a 1st stage landing on six hydraulic legs which ought to be only slightly more complicated than a Falcon 9 landing but will still take some time work out. Like F9, NG will have to be refurbed and transported to a launch site before going up again, whereas the SH booster would, in theory, be landing ON it's launch pad, ready to be refueled.
...using before Apple decided to use intelligence
.. that is Boeing, Airbus, Lockheed-Martin, Northrop-Grumman, L3Harrris and Space ULA, say they'd be making one SLS a day too if NASA would pay them to.
...of putting menus only on the top of the screen instead of on the relevant window like everything else does?
... the other Type 2 hypervisor which has always been free
...then I expect ICBMs will be the fastest ones for quite some time. Unless you insist on cameras being attached.
"Life is a garment we continuously alter, but which never seems to fit." -- David McCord
