Comment Re:I'll be the first to say... (Score 1) 943
Comment Re:What happems (Score 1) 491
I have never really understood why many Americans are so hostile to unionization..
Visit Detroit.
Comment Re:That's what touchscreens do (Score 1) 398
Comment Fake.IT (Score 1) 247
Comment Re:Wow (Score 1) 566
Comment Re:stopped using it? (Score 1) 857
Comment Long-standing MIT hack (Score 1) 292
Comment Re:What happens when people change their minds.. (Score 1) 299
Comment It's all theirs. (Score 1) 271
Today the Web. Tomorrow the Cloud. This problem has lots of room to grow.
Comment Re:One more issue (Score 1) 1065
Mark-to-Market has a pretty horrible, if generally unknown, history. The American FASB (Financial Accounting Standards Board) had decreed mark-to-market not long before the 2008 global liquidity collapse. The old rule was that assets were kept on the books at cost, until sold or depreciated away. For the most part, in even a slightly inflationary world, this left assets undervalued and income under-reported.
Under mark-to-market, things went swimmingly for a while. Everyone got a boost to earnings, which lifted stock prices.
To understand what happened next, an understanding of Systems Dynamics is helpful. Created by Jay Forrester at MIT in the 1950s, SD models systems in terms of feedback - which comes in two basic flavors.
Negative - where a deviation in one direction is countered with a correction in the opposite direction. If you drift to the left, you steer to the right.
Positive - the response to a deviation is to pile on increasingly more of the same, such as neutrons in a fission bomb.
Then came the disasterous deviation, the reduction in confidence in sub-prime mortgages and their price. Under Mark-to-Market, the asset-reduction had to be taken even though the securities hadn't been sold. Mark-to-Market kicked off a downward spiral in asset values. Banks, because of capitalization requirements, started dumping mortgage-backed securities, driving the values down even more, necessitating more dumping of everything, e.g., corporate bonds, and on and on.
[Note: the FASB did a study of mark-to-market after the fact, absolved themselves of responsibility and quietly neutered it.]
Now, how bad an idea is Mark-to-Market Taxation? If it passes, buy canned goods.
Comment Re:Less brief, more detailed answer (Score 1) 556
NASA is going to die. Cold Fusion is like Steve Jobs in Switzerland.
Comment Defuturize! (Score 1) 545
I wrote a program for a software company (cannot name) that automated much of the documentation process. It took specs and replaced the future tense with the present tense as a first rough-cut. Most of it was pretty simple, actually. "X will load Y into Z" became "X loads Y into Z". The programmers actually enjoyed correcting the sometimes garbled English. Most importantly, it sped the process up 5x. I named the program "The Defuturizor" after
Comment Re:Web Based Document Editing (Score 1) 178
Karma. In the early 1990s, MS blew Lotus 1-2-3 out of the sky with Excel by including a "translation" program that worked about as well as a blender with the top off. Funny to hear MS squak now that Google is giving them a taste of the same stinky shaft.
Comment Re:Obvious answer? (Score 1) 736
Al Qaeda recruited an Art Major and told her. "Go shoot the President of the United States!" She bought a camera.
Al Qaeda recruited a Music Major and asked. "Do you know how to blow up a bridge?" He replied, "No, but if you hum a few bars I can fake it."
Al Qaeda recruited a Psychology Major and said "Destroy the Evil One!" He shot himself.
Al Qaeda recruited an English Major and told her. "We need a whopper!" She said, "Do you want fries with that?"
.