Starlink and cell networks are the same thing from a network access and architecture perspective. They have the same issues and technical concerns around scaling wireless capacity. If cell networks qualify, Starlink qualifies, QED.
Not necessarily. Cellular problems are often a back-haul issue and that is something Starlink does much better at. The flip side, is that I would not want to use a Starlink in even a moderately dense area.
They might have cell service, but it is often a weak signal that is then sent by microwave from tower to tower and those links often don't have enough bandwidth for anything useful.
I have some friends who lived on a property that was only 10 mins from the nearest town of 83 000 people and the reception was so bad there that they had to go by satellite dish which had latency so bad that they could not video conference. They signed on as soon as there was a Starlink beta program in their area and I heard from them that getting StarLink was a life changer even with the early glitches.
Why should Netflix care if you are actually watching it or not? You pay for a subscription and for whatever reason that was the content you played. Netflix will therefore keep playing that content. When it comes to revenue, it just doesn't matter what you do with the content.
At any rate, whatever flaws there are in the stats, they are far more accurate than TV viewership numbers.
So, everyone is saying "call roadside Asst.".
Correct
That means now they are assuming/requiring that everyone join and pay for a AAA membership because they won't put spares in cars anymore?
Note quite, the dealers often have their own roadside assistance that costs more than AA/AAA/CAA (depending on where you live)
This doesn't do much good if you happen to get a flat out on the highway away from the bigger cities and maybe don't have good cellular signals.
I've never had AAA....wonder how much extra I'm gonna have to now pay for that annually?
AAA is not expensive, but you are right. If you are going someplace remote, plan for it. And those plans had better include an actual jack that will take more trunk space than the piece of crap they ship with the car.
The jacks that come with many ICE cars are a joke anyways. I will never forget trying to change the tire on my friend's BMW only to have the jack fail. In the end I called road side who pulled out a real jack, fixed the tire and then asked "Why even bother trying to do it yourself?"
At the very least...I can imagine items getting beat up a LOT more in transit without a box and padding, as they still often get a bit beat up IN a box with padding.
No thank you, gimme a box and packaging and padding.
About half of the time the extra box is too big and then not padded correctly causing the contents to bounce around and receive more damage than it would have gotten without the extra packaging.
Don't even get me started on the box in a box in a box I got last week. The building Janitor resents the amount of recycling I put out every week.
WeWork never had any trouble filling it's spaces. There are plenty of companies wanting workspace without paying for a full office. WeWork's problem from the beginning was corporate excesses bleeding profits. You just don't buy corporate jets before the income can support it and this wasn't their only excess
Machines will buy more raw materials to create server space to sustain themselves and multiply. This is called the "paperclip maximizer problem" in AI safety circles. Eventually they will convert the iron in your blood into server racks and the carbon from your body into rocket ships to mine asteroids to make more server racks.
It is a consequence of "instrumental convergence".
Heck, James Cameron was right about the OceanGate Titan when Stockton Rush asked him to endorse the project.
Look at the percentage of men under 30 who have had sex in the year surveyed, and compare before and after the advent of the Tinder algorithm.
Elliot Rodger was radicalized by PUA Hate message boards, but to be radicalized you first need what the CIA calls a "personal injury".
For Islamic terrorists, the "personal injury" is usually as simple as simple poverty, in countries that have extreme GINI Coefficients. The Tinder ELO score (ranking system) created a GINI Coefficient for sex more extreme than 95% of economies in the world.
Hold my gamepad.
More likely, fears of a recession were a good excuse to cut positions/departments that were just not making a good return on investment. If you make layoffs when times are good you risk bad press about the health of the business, during a recession means you get to blame the economy.
As for IBM, I struggle to understand their long term business prospects. Plenty of places for older people to go, just not tech startups. Banks for instance pay good money for the 60+ crowd. Where I work, there are plenty of people who are older. They are kept precisely because they know more than anyone else about what is going on.
The Macintosh is Xerox technology at its best.