Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Submission Summary: 0 pending, 25 declined, 5 accepted (30 total, 16.67% accepted)

The Internet

Submission + - Vint Cerf Questions Whether Internet Access Should (nytimes.com)

Gallenod writes: In an op-ed for the New York Times (registration/subscription required), Vint Cerf writes that civil protests around the world, sparked by Internet communications, 'have raised questions about whether Internet access is or should be a civil or human right." Cerf argues that "technology is an enabler of rights, not a right itself," and contends that for something to be considered a human right, it "must be among the things we as humans need in order to lead healthy, meaningful lives, like freedom from torture or freedom of conscience. It is a mistake to place any particular technology in this exalted category, since over time we will end up valuing the wrong things.'
Patents

Submission + - Judge Make Lawyers Pay For Frivolous Patent Suit

Gallenod writes: The Denver Post (http://www.denverpost.com/popular/ci_8354619) has an article about the U.S. 10th Circuit Court of Appeals upholiding the decision of a Federal judge who threw out and reversed a jury decision in favor of a patent infringement claim and ordered the plaintiff's lawyers to pay the defendents' court costs. U.S. District Senior Judge Richard P. Matsch sanctioned the plaintiff's attorneys for "cavalier and abusive" misconduct and for having a "what can I get away with?" attitude during a 13-day patent infringement trial in Denver. With the Appeals Court in agreement, could this case be the "shot heard round the world" in the revolution against patent trolls?

Slashdot Top Deals

God is real, unless declared integer.

Working...