HEIC is worthless because it's illegal to implement unless you get permission. Maybe in 20 years it'll be usable.
Don't like that fact? Then we need to find and support (oh no, and be?) political candidates who oppose software patents.
You shouldn't need anyone's permission to write a computer program. It's infuriating.
You also don't want to see security updates? It's simply not safe to use an old browser.
Something true about Hamas like it was founded in response to the Ibrahimi mosque massacre, or that Netanyahu has bragged repeatedly to the international news media about making sure they get funded as part of his strategy on Gaza?
This, and this is why private equity firms are a negative to capitalism.
Private equity firms are capitalism in pure form, as they are capital controlling the means of production, which is capitalism's definition.
Private equity forms are a negative for humanity, but so is uncontrolled capitalism, so that checks out.
Rights have limitation based on law, actual harm.
You just argued that you shouldn't have to take harm into account.
It would be cool if you had any internally consistent beliefs whatsoever.
Weird that those very same voices aren't calling the LLM companies forever-student nerd parasites
It's not weird, though. They either hope to profit from these corporations' activities, or they're just prosperity theologists. Neither thing is rare.
the prevailing ethical rule is that the impact on the listener matters more than the intent of the speaker
That's how literally everything works, not just speech.
When you have rights without responsibilities, nothing works.
"OpenAI says an unreleased internal model has produced 372 results that either resolve or make substantial progress on open problems"
Look at how much we're accomplishing!
"which was produced through the collective efforts of a 10,000-strong agentic swarm that cost millions of dollars in computing power"
Look at how impressive our hardware is!
The rapeublicans are literally running the Nazi playbook, which is ironic because that was inspired by the USA's laws about slavery. Now which is the party of slavery again? I think I'll go with the party that controls the state where we still have slaves picking cotton.
Slashdot was relevant.
Weird they want to remind us of that.
He's literally insane. His earliest posts weren't like this.
I guess it's probably about to get an order of magnitude worse and the only way to navigate it will be crowdsourcing, but the gaming world already feels much like people are prompting their way to releasing games. Remember the days when there were only dozens or hundreds of games released per year? What seems crazy to me is that although most of them have very low-quality assets, there's so many actually playable and working games which are more or less fully realized, at least to the point that they have entire communities. I guess that's a testament to the ease of game creation with some of these engines.
The interesting AI-related question to me is whether it's going to increase or decrease average quality. TBH I think it might actually increase it, because so many of these games are so half-assed. At minimum it should make them prettier.
Agents don't cause attacks. People running agents do.
The people who ran the agents were negligent at best but I have an alternate theory.
If they knew the technology could go sideways and hack things then they effectively executed those hacks intentionally.
If not they are only negligently ignorant which is not generally a crime in this context.
They like it when they are the ones with exclusive access because they feel special.
They don't like it otherwise but rapidly forget they paid to be fucked over.
Go back further and you'll see he wasn't like that until Obama got elected.
Racism broke his brain.
The world is coming to an end. Please log off.
