I'm not aware of any way of making coconut cream other than from shredded coconut meat. "Ice coconut cream" fits the schema of your earlier post, but I wasn't sure whether you'd admit "coconut cream" as a noun phrase. When I made a frozen emulsion from coconut cream, lemongrass, ginger, and palm sugar I called it "coconut, lemongrass and ginger ice-cream" but explained to my friends that it was dairy-free so the lactose-intolerant could eat it. (I also served it as a starter, with prawn crackers, rather than a dessert, but that was for practical reasons: we were having a picnic at the beach and I wanted to serve it before it melted).

To answer the direct question, I think my grandparents got them from a local butcher in Ulverston. But note

The combinations of permitted herbs and spices may vary from butcher to butcher, but the prominent taste of Traditional Cumberland Sausage is quite spicy due to the generous amount of pepper added which is accompanied by a strong taste of herbs.

I must admit that I don't remember the "strong taste of herbs", but I do remember the pepper being the dominant flavour, sufficiently so that you would need quite a refined palate to precisely identify the source of umami.

Since you say in another recent comment that you're in San Diego, your experience is probably centred there. Although both burger and patty were originally primarily North American lexemes, the former has achieved much more international recognition. The Oxford English Dictionary describes burger as "Originally U.S." and patty as "Chiefly North American". While Vegeburger may have been an attempt to create market confusion when it was coined 80 years ago, "veggie burger" is the only name (except for more specific names such as "falafel") for approximate discs of minced vegetables intended for frying that I've heard in British English, and when it's used to describe home-cooked food there's no "market" in scope.

Gambling has been lucrative since a bunch of cavemen got together and started rolling rocks in the back of the cave for the best cut of Wooly Mammoth. That's never going to change. The dropout will more than likely die a rich man.

I've been skeptical about the "Windows games on Linux" thing, but I'm hearing nothing but good things about Proton. If it is indeed as good as advertised, it could truly a way for young men to finally get out of the Windows world.

I would have moved my parents to Google's Chrome OS Flex, but while it's super fast and does a few things extremely well, its lack of support for things like DVD playback is a killer in the "Upgrade for Grandma" department.

It may never be a better time, but this is a huge reason why there will never be a "year of the Linux desktop". When Microsoft cuts support, most people will just knuckle under and buy new machines, even if they're happy with what they've been using. They bitch. They threaten. They shake their fist and tell Microsoft they'll go to something else. But most just give in and write the check.

That's odd: coconut milk is called "milk of coconut" in Spain. Link to Spanish supermarket product listing might work: I'm not sure whether it will want you to give a postcode.

What would you call my recipes which use coconut cream?

Here's a better idea, how about stop trying to make vegetables look and taste like meat?

Veggie burgers and sausages predate "trying to make vegetables look and taste like meat" by decades. They exist for the same reason that meat is made into burgers and sausages: it's a convenient form factor for cooking and eating.

It shouldn't be hard to make something taste like Cumberland sausage: MSG and black pepper should suffice. So as long as you can make the texture appetising that would be one of the easiest meat products to substitute.

The critical difference was that those old machines, and the software that replaced them, were created to make human workers more productive. To grow company profits through increased worker output. AI is designed to increase profits by flat out replacing those workers, not making them more productive. AI is intended to kill two birds with one algorithm: create software that does human work better and faster than any human could, and then eliminate the costs of human employment.... salaries, insurance and other benefits, training, et al. That's the crucial difference, the intent to replace people, period.

"As a European"...

You have zero room to talk. France has just collapsed. Again. France, Spain, Italy, and Greece all have debt exceeding 100% of their GDP. And you can't even defend your own shores from an army of military age North African men that are coming in waves specifically to sponge off of your welfare systems. Europe is a pressure cooker right now, and you're doing nothing to free any pressure.

I heard philosophy grads say the same thing. They were still always short on money.

Engineers have always made more money than the pure-science grads, and this accelerated in the 60's. Even the mathematicians jumped over, largely because if you have a talent for math, its fairly easy for you to slide into engineering, with is mostly math anyway. Just math with a real-world purpose. It's funny because, at the end of WWII, there was a big debate about where US science research funding should go. One camp wanted practical research focus with real-world goals... "Build me a generator with twice the output", etc. Lyndon Johnson famously summed up this approach with the question "What will it do for Grandma?". The other side argued for instead funding pure science research based on curiosity, and argued that practical advances would trickle down from those results. The pure science camp won for a short while, but what killed it was the Space Race. The US needed specific machines with specific capabilities on a specific deadline. "Pure Science for the principal of it" fell by the wayside to "We need that rocket to have a 60% thrust efficiency increase, next year". And it's been that way ever since. In the marketplace, and especially in the marketplace of ideas, practical engineering won. And what research we still did tended to be dominated by hyper-expensive physics projects that had practically no commercial applications at all. I think the death of the Super-Conducting Supercollider in Texas was the death knell of big pure science projects in the US. As a result, engineers are actually doing a good bit of our basic research now. It's just folded into their commercial projects.

Engineering spacecraft modules will get you a high income with steady, reliable pay. Choosing to look for particles that may never be found will not.

"AI" (which isn't really AI, but)... is indeed being overhyped. But it's also still going to kill millions of jobs that won't be replaced by new jobs. Both things can be true at the same time. And while AI will indeed create some new jobs "caring and feeding" for AI, it'll kill off far more in other fields that will never be made up, unlike, say, when the Model T largely replaced the horse and buggy. A major reason for what we're calling AI is to replace human jobs in order for companies to save money on human expenses. It's why these companies backed AI in the first place. Shareholder Value Uber Alles.