Become a fan of Slashdot on Facebook

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
Science

Submission + - Magical Thinking Is Good for You 2

Hugh Pickens writes writes: "Natalie Wolchover writes that even the most die-hard skeptics among us believe in magic. Humans can't help it: though we try to be logical, irrational beliefs — many of which we aren't even conscious of — are hardwired in our psyches. "The unavoidable habits of mind that make us think luck and supernatural forces are real, that objects and symbols have power, and that humans have souls and destinies are part of what has made our species so evolutionarily successful," writes Wolchover. "Believing in magic is good for us." For example, what do religion, anthropomorphism, mysticism and the widespread notion that each of us has a destiny to fulfill have in common? According to research by Matthew Hutson, underlying all these forms of magical thinking is the innate sense that everything happens for a reason. And that stems from paranoia, which is a safety mechanism that protects us. "We have a bias to see events as intentional, and to see objects as intentionally designed," says Hutson. "If we don't see any biological agent, like a person or animal, then we might assume that there's some sort of invisible agent: God or the universe in general with a mind of its own." According to anthropologists, the reason we have a bias to assume things are intentional is that typically it's safer to spot another agent in your environment than to miss another agent. "It's better to mistake a boulder for a bear than a bear for a boulder," says Stewart Guthrie. In a recent Gallup poll, three in four Americans admitted to believing in at least one paranormal phenomenon--clairvoyance, haunted houses, witches, etc. and in nearly every country around the world, the percentage of self-described atheists is only in the single digits. "But even for those few of us who claim to be complete skeptics, belief quietly sneaks in. Maybe you feel anxious on Friday the 13th. Maybe the idea of a heart transplant from a convicted killer weirds you out. Or maybe you're convinced that if you wear your sweats to Target you'll run into at least three people you know. If so, on some level you believe in magic.""

Comment Re:Difficult problem (Score 1) 210

My point is that it was the German Merck's page before Facebook made the mistake. It is apparently this mistake that started the whole problem.

Facebook doesn't want to take part in the legal battle? Well, they should return things to how they were before they messed up, and if there is a trademark issue, then Merck US should file a complaint and try to get the page taken down, erased, whatever. There ARE proper channels for trademark violations.

Comment Re:Difficult problem (Score 1) 210

I don't think that there is a choice here. If one company had the page, then it should be returned to them.

If a valet parking makes a mistake and gives your car keys to someone else, they can't say: "oh, sorry, we made a mistake... however, the new guy really likes your car, so unless you come to an agreement, we won't give the car to either of you".
Biotech

Submission + - Patent trolls in biotechnology (nature.com)

GNUman writes: A news story in this week's Nature Journal talks about patent trolls attacking biotech companies. They cite a case in which the US federal court of appeals upheld 'a patent that covered the idea of trying to link infant vaccination with later immune disorders.' The news story also references an interesting article from researchers at Boston University School of Law (Bessen, James E. et al, 2011, 'The Private and Social Costs of Patent Trolls'), in which they analyze the effect of litigation on the wealth of the defendants via their stock's value before and after litigation, and given that such loss minimally translates into an increment in the wealth of the inventor, they determine that patent litigation harms society and removes incentives for innovation.
Biotech

Submission + - The Weed Genome (nature.com)

GNUman writes: Maybe soon we'll be able to genetically modify humans so that a specific action (e.g., tapping your nose, pinching your ear) triggers the release of THC directly from your own cells! From the Nature Blog post:
"At last, the field of genomics has something to offer Cheech and Chong. DNA sequencing hit a new high last night with the midnight release of the Cannabis sativa genome. The raw sequence was posted on Amazon’s EC2 public cloud computing service by a young company called Medicinal Genomics, which aims to explore the genomes of therapeutic plants."

Comment Re:Knife the Hardware? (Score 1) 578

They could use it also to have their flagship phone. Just as they have Nexus One (HTC) and the Nexus S (Samsung), but may now have 100% control under how it is built. Having their "own" phone now hasn't driven others away, but has helped set the stage as to what you should get from a fully Android compliant phone.

Slashdot Top Deals

Chemistry professors never die, they just fail to react.

Working...