Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re: Regulations? (Score 1) 49

This isn't about the slop. If you're a fan of regulation, and saving jobs isn't a good enough reason for you, wait you're not actually a fan.

Except banning tools used for efficiency isn't about saving jobs. This isn't a zero sum game (in the literal sense). There's not a fixed number of games that developers are able to be hired for or worked on. There's a question of how much of a game needs how many resources attached to it, nothing more, nothing less. Less developers needed for one game allows a second game to be made by the same resources. If anything the world would be a better place if people worked on something other than yet another Call of Duty.

Also it's horseshit to claim you're not a fan of regulation just because you're not a fan of saving job through forcing inefficiency. What next, you're not a fan of regulation unless you support a government program of forced employment because it creates jobs? Just remember next time you hear about unemployment going up while you eat your burger that you're not getting food poisoning because of regulations and that it has nothing to do with jobs. What a fucking stupid argument you just made.

Comment Re:Regulations? (Score 1) 49

What Market? You mean the one were people are complaing about AI Slop in video games as was quoted in the article. So it seem the market has spoken and yes they would like regulation.

In what way has the market spoken by asking for regulation? The market doesn't ask for regulation. If you want to make a point then you could post references to the fact that Call of Duty: Black Ops 7 has underperformed on release quite massively. That's a market response. It's also an indication that regulation isn't needed.

Comment Re:Kind of like (Score 3, Interesting) 26

That's not even remotely comparable. There's no academic debate about the efficacy of essential oils. There's wide spread agreement that they do fuck all. Since you like Wikipedia so much: "There is not sufficient evidence that it can effectively treat any condition.[3] Improper use of essential oils may cause harm including allergic reactions, inflammation and skin irritation. Children may be particularly susceptible to the toxic effects of improper use.[4][5] Essential oils can be poisonous if ingested or absorbed through the skin.[5]"

Cloud seeding on the other hand has had mixed results. The problems with it is that it is unclear precisely on the conditions of it working, on how it works in different cloud types, and how it is best used. The problem is that many of the studies on it question whether it can produce rain from incredible dryness. It can't. It does however actively work in inducing rainfall from certain clouds in certain conditions.

If you want the medical equivalent: I don't have a headache now, taking an aspirin will do nada for my head, that doesn't mean aspirin won't solve your headache, it may be able to, which in turn doesn't mean it will also fix a migraine induced headache, which it can't. Fortunately after years of aspirin's effectiveness being a subject of debate among scientists we do have a clear picture of what it can and can't do to your headache. Unlike essential oils which is settled science that it's "alternate therapy" (i.e. scam) for a reason, and unlike cloud seeding which is still actively debated.

Comment Re:Why can't Europe (Score 2) 9

It's almost like you don't know what market power is. Hint: Europe brings them up all the time, and Americans keep buying them out. Is there something in the Literally last week the most recent European cloud company was bought out by an American firm https://ancillary-proxy.atarimworker.io?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.dutchnews.nl%2F2025%2F... Is there something in American culture that prevents them from innovating instead relying on buying European companies?

Comment Re:We've seen this pattern before. (Score 4, Interesting) 64

That's only very partially true. The uptick in unpaid mortgages gave the house of cards a little tap; but it was the giant pile of increasingly exotic leverage constructed on top of the relatively boring retail debt that actually gave the situation enough punch to be systemically dangerous; along with the elaborate securitizing, slicing, and trading making it comparatively cumbersome for people to just renegotiate a mortgage headed toward delinquency and take a relatively controlled writedown; rather than just triggering a repossession that left them with a bunch of real estate they weren't well equipped to sell.

Comment Re:Mostly agree (Score 1) 81

I do agree that incentives (and dis-incentives) are typically superior to other forms of regulation.

For example, a higher property tax for unoccupied buildings (or a tax break based on occupancy) might help get things moving.

Though, in the case of commercial property, that might not be enough. A root cause is Bank officers handing out loans like candy and basing the value of the collateral property on "anticipated rent". The owners are now afraid lowering the rent will trigger a re-valuation and the bank demanding repayment or starting foreclosure. Meanwhile, those officers know of the situation but don't want to rock the boat until they can get promoted far enough away not to have it come back on them , or better, make it to retirement first.

In truth, forced re-valuation is most likely the only way to break that log-jam at this point. The market isn't going to grow enough to actually make those turkeys rentable at current asking.

For residential, a grace period on some of those rennovations in exchange for actual occupancy may help.

Comment Re:How about typing! (Score 1) 210

Then, as computers took over the world, schools ironically started to *drop* typing from their curricula. Why on earth?

To be fair typing is a skill you can sort of pickup. I never took lessons. I never was taught. Yet I can type comfortably 85wpm. Kids will learn the medium used and typing is simple to learn based on simply putting hands somewhere and going ham.

Cursive on the other hand is a fine motor skill. You can't just magically pick it up like typing. You need to know what you're looking at and go out of your way to do it since you're not exposed to it automatically outside of education, a doctor's visit or reading a Christmas card from grandma.

Typing isn't part of the curriculum at my wife's school, yet nearly all her kids can touch type.

Comment Re:Need a prescription. (Score 1) 49

As the other poster says, the reason for the shortage is because successive British governments have cut funding in the NHS in real terms, and are now flailing around as those cuts have really started to bite.

And every time the doctors or nurses strike to make a point, they get gaslit because "think of the patients".

Healthcare systems run on two things - staff, and good will.

The government has reduced the staff well below minimum, and burned up all the good will, so now theres nothing left. Fewer doctors are coming into the NHS through British training schemes because those are capped and indeed some have been reduced recently, and more doctors are retiring early or leaving the country.

And thats not counting the doctors who were forced to retire early because of the Tory governments cap on lifetime pension contributions - when the government dictates how much you pay into your pension, and also dictate that above a certain threshold of lifetime contributions you become liable for a huge tax bill immediately, and you cant withdraw from the pension contributions without also forfeiting the pension itself, then your only option to avoid a huge tax bill is ... retirement....

Comment Re: (Score 1) 210

This reeks of "I was put through this crap when I was young, so today's youth should also be put through this crap".

Everything reeks of something when you don't put effort into understanding it. Cursive writing has practical benefits for improving the speed of note taking, improving reading comprehension (a lot of stuff is written in cursive), and improving fine motor skills.

I'm honestly shocked that it's not taught in Florida right now... explains quite a bit actually. There's lots of useless things to be upset about, but this isn't one of them. Rather than saying it reeks of something, why not research what benefits it may bring? Or do you reek of ignorance?

Comment Re: It a guidebook... (Score 1) 210

I can type 240wpm.... Older PC's system buffers, would still be spitting out text up to a minute after I am done typing.

World record for sustained typing speed is 170-220wpm depending on duration. Also the type of buffers which can't keep up with this speed are also the kind of buffers that fill up with as little as 50 characters and then start beeping at you. No the buffer was never spitting out words for a minute after you're done and every kid could type fast enough to outrun the buffer on their PC and cause it to beep. That's not impressive.

Anyway leaving your completely made up bullshit, you also ignored context switching. Pen in hand for note taking it is far faster to be able to draw a quick picture in a notepad than a PC. Combine that with cursive and you quickly outdo anything you can play with on your keyboard.

You know what is absolutely faster than typing? Shorthand-cursive. Those guys can do 300wpm which is only slightly behind using a stenographer's keyboard which you definitely aren't using.

Slashdot Top Deals

A rock store eventually closed down; they were taking too much for granite.

Working...