It's okay to like a movie and criticize it at the same time. Even the best movies have their flaws; indeed, a flawless movie probably wouldn't be very interesting to watch or discuss.
Oh, absolutely. My problem is just how these criticisms are being framed -- it sounds like they have some behind-the-scenes insights into Villeneuve's feelings about the film gleaned from an interview, or something.
Greatly dislike how this article frames opinion as fact. It keeps saying "Villeneuve does this", or "Villeneuve wanted that", but gives no source for the claims. To me, it's clear this article is just a shitty, deceptive, self-righteous way of stating one's personal observations.
Observations I happen to generally disagree with. I loved the hell out of this flick; it touched me on an almost personal level, like no film as done in a long time.
I'm not going to suggesting this article is just the inevitable mainstream contrarianism when something is widely beloved, but I'm having a hard time not pulling the trigger on saying it...
Suck on that, SpaceX, you fucking hacks!
Hey, folks. There's a couple places I could probably post this, but figured this was as good a place as any.
Anyway, you can check it out on the Chrome web store: https://ancillary-proxy.atarimworker.io?url=https%3A%2F%2Fchrome.google.com%2Fwebs...
Or hit up the GitHub repo: https://ancillary-proxy.atarimworker.io?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2FFortyseven%2F...
You can give someone food, or you can teach them to grow it. Probably the idea at play here. Sure, you can do whatever you want to them, but they'll never
Each honest calling, each walk of life, has its own elite, its own aristocracy based on excellence of performance. -- James Bryant Conant
