Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:I am fake as fuck at work (Score 3, Insightful) 96

I am a teacher. I am well versed in pedagogy and the accompanying jargon. Similar to corporate speak, the social sciences also have their own jargon to specify certain patterns. I just don’t. I use plain, simple words. I do this with my colleagues, I do this with parents. Some regard me as unprofessional because of this—especially parents who are teachers themselves. But usually, after a few meetings they get used to it, and often they even join me in speaking like a normal human being. I once had a professor in pedagogy who eventually adapted to it as well. It took two years, but my last conversation with her this August was a warm, relaxed chat. Stop pretending. We are all ordinary, fallible human beings. The more you compensate, the more you embarrass yourself. Just quit it.
For those in denial, here is the same comment in jargon:
As pedagogy is maintained by large, longstanding institutions, it is not unexpected that these institutions display the classic features of institutionalism, where scientifically grounded principles gradually become diluted and begin to function more as rituals. It is therefore imperative to remain critical of established, purely cognition-based frameworks. Let us not underestimate the potential gains that can be achieved through simple, ordinary situated cognition.
Plain words may not be polished. They may not be backed by elaborate statistics that prove significance while hiding sensitivity. They may sometimes be wrong, even painful, and yes—innocence can be lost. But our cognitive abilities are limited, and our subconscious exists for a reason: to help us act without overthinking, to carry what cannot be neatly calculated. Life is too short to dissect every detail into theory. Speak simply. Think clearly. Be human.

Comment Union bashing (Score 4, Informative) 79

So I am in a union. You guessed it, I live in the EU. I do not get it when people say unions are not a good idea. It is a pretty simple concept. People with shared interests form a group to defend those interests. Why? So you can focus on your job and do not need to be an expert in law. Had a case where the company was demanding too many hours w. r. t. Our contract. Union looked at it. Talked to the boss. Concluded that despite it was breaching contract, it was in everybodies best interest to do it. They are pretty reasonable. Of course if the elections get near, they can exaggerate and get political. Just like real politicians, CEOs, over ambitious managers, you name it.
If you are not unionized, you are a sitting duck. HR has way more expertise in that field than you. They have way more time to spend on working on some ploy. It is like going to trial without a lawyer because you are smart and full of confidence that you can easily handle this with a bit of googling. If I was a CEO? I'd form a union exclusively for CEOs. Have trouble with the board? Ask advice from your union. They probably have experience with the exact situation you are in. Stops you from wasting time reinventing the wheel.

Comment Re:Why this spammy propaganda? (Score 1) 79

There is this very persistent thought pattern present in a lot of American minds. "If it is different from what we do, it must be bad." So... socialism... I am not going to define it. But it involves unions. US has no real union culture. Other countries do, so it must be bad. Then the rationalization start. Long story short, we have all these marvelous things because unions could not do their annoying thing in the US. Oh and unions are dysfunctional. Do not work. Waste of money.
You can startdiscussing. It is a bottomless pit. Why? It is not about unions at all. Because if unions make life better, then the US is not the greatest and a big soothing part of their identity is wrong. It is like the death of a good friend. You do not want that, you will fight till your last breath before you let that happen.
Luckily not all Americans are like that. Lots and lots of diversity out there. Mind blowing how things still work even if they work completely different. Too much for our little brains to process. Sucks.

Comment Re: ID (Score 1) 149

Well, that's what makes this complicated I guess, new laws, new ethics to be explored.
For formal stuff, we have ways of identifying ourselves here in Belgium. For banking apps, communication with the government, the same system is used. It lacks (to my knowledge) a messaging service though. Well, you can send registered emails if you pay, but to my knowledge, this isn't used that much. If someone's name is formally tied to a message, I bet phishing messages would diminish. Of course, if you get hacked the consequences are worse. Oh well, not up to me to change the world.Plenty of brains out there.

Comment Re:WWII (Score 1) 119

Uhm, you are showing very strong signs of black and white thinking. Let me help you nuance it.
- They did do it to make amo
- It was a too great succes, there was an oversuply
- They continued anyway because it was unifying and of great propaganda value.
Your conclusion: "They did it to manipulate people" throws out a lot of the info here. It is one of the reasons, yes, but as always, the reality is a lot complexer.
So throw out those boolean variables. Try something more advanced. Do not jump to bytes, you will go nuts. Try 3 bit values first. That will be a huge improvement. Probably even sufficient to overcomplicate things. So take care.

Comment Re:Enshitification (Score 2) 119

We do seem to have lost common sense there, I hate to admit it as I despise people like Trump and Poetin. But we do have gone too far. It reminds me of a specific type of narcissism. You know the person who does all the church charity and makes sure that everybody notices. The person that always talks about how much they sacrificed for the common good. "Yesterday, I deleted all my emails. It is good for the environment you know. It will save water and we need more water available. It causes me great trouble, but I did it anyway. Now I am thinking about how I can save water by more efficiently cleaning my kitchen gear. I use it a lot. Every church event I bake marvelous deserts and sell them. The profit always go to the charity and they are very happy about it. But I need a lot of water to clean the kitchen gear. Maybe if I did everything by hand instead of with the food processor, I could save some water.
Luckily it is a minority, but they sure are loud. As loud as those extreme right wing idiots.
Maybe we should not delete those emails. Maybe we should delete the extremist idiots and make boringly normal great again. Pretty sure it would save lots of water and other stuff.

Comment Re:Enshitification (Score 1) 119

I was wondering the same. I am an early gmail user. I do not delete messages as it is very convenient if you need to look something up afterwards. Is my vacuum cleaner still in waranty? Let's search for the invoice in my mailbox.
So my mailbox has grown to several gigabytes. I imagine google needs water to cool the server that stores my emails.If we all start deleting our mails, less harddrives are needed, less heat is generated and less water is needed. (I am no expert, this is what I get if I think this through).
... I do an email search maybe once every month. I can imagine google sneekingly putting all my emails on a drive that is spun down most of the time. You know, to save expenses. There, problem solved. No worries, google, I can wait a few dozens of seconds to get my result.Take your time to spin it up.
Too simple? Probably. Feasible to reduce powerconsumption comparable to deleting the mails with a bit of wit? Sure!
Drama queens...
I tell you what. Instead of deleting my mails and data, I will flush my toilets with rain water, I will not water the grass in the garden. I will take short showers and I will not clean my car. Oh, I am already doing that... You are welcome.
Oh, I need to be in the UK to make it count. Sorry.

Slashdot Top Deals

In 1914, the first crossword puzzle was printed in a newspaper. The creator received $4000 down ... and $3000 across.

Working...