You are making it harder than it actually is.
Do the landlord record my Personally Identifiable Information? If so, I have the right to know what information they log about me. I also have the right to get that information removed. The PII is mine according to GDPR. I only license the data to the processor for the maximum duration needed for them to provide the service I use (unless there are a "legitimate reason" such as needing to comply with laws and regulations to keep the data on file for a longer period).
GDPR - just as any other EU regulation - isn't really that difficult to handle. It is grounded in the common sense of putting the consumer's right in the center. I guess that's why ToS geared towards Europeans are generally shorter than the ToS/EULAs written by American companies.
Side-note: I recently compared the EULA/ToS from Nintendo that applies to Europeans with the ones applying to US citizens. It was quite an eye-opener.
I can understand that LinkedIn wants to protect their business by not making the information directly available through a single click, but that does not invalidate my rights, nor does my rights invalidate LinkedIn's "reasonable need" to process my data in the way they do.
From the perspective of "privacy of the other part" - if they do not consent to being exposed (but they actually do consent anyway), they probably shouldn't be using LinkedIn or any other social media at all.
I know the notion of freedom of information is new in the US and that US-based companies are having problems adapting to this reality, but for the rest of the industrial world, it has been around for ages; even hundreds of years in some countries.
Ah, well.
That said, yes, human activity might indeed contribute in some way to both the current stability and a potential bigger-than-usual increase in temperature.
But on the contrary, the drifference is due to Europe adds 20-25% state VAT to the customer prices.
. Without the VAT, the prices in the US would actually be higher than those in Europe. But I guess, VAT is a small price to pay for having universal healthcare and not having a constant budget deficit.
If there's a will, there's a way.
It's not legal for a manufacturer to brick anything that's sold to you, especially without compensation.
If they do within the 3 year mandatory warranty, they've got to give the money back or a replacement. Simple as that.
I shouldn't need to hire a lawyer to review the license agreement just because I want to buy a simple game console.
It's kind of basic consumer rights that's really easy to give to consumers for any company, regardless of size.
From the European eula:
"NCL IS liable for damages arising as a foreseeable result of NCL's negligence or NCL's breach of this Agreement. We do NOT in any way exclude or limit our liability for: [...] fraud or fraudulent misrepresentation; [...] description, satisfactory quality and fitness for purpose of products [...] ; and product liability."
That statement is in the US version replaced by "NINTENDO SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS ANY GUARANTEE OR WARRANTY THAT THE NINTENDO ACCOUNT SERVICES OR ANY CONTENT YOU MAY STORE OR ACCESS THROUGH THE NINTENDO ACCOUNT SERVICES WILL NOT BE SUBJECT TO DISRUPTION, DAMAGE, CORRUPTION, LOSS, REMOVAL, OR DISCONTINUATION (A âoeSERVICE INTERRUPTION"). NINTENDO SHALL NOT BE RESPONSIBLE SHOULD ANY SUCH SERVICE INTERRUPTION OCCUR, AND YOU AGREE THAT IN NO EVENT WILL YOU BE ENTITLED TO OR RECEIVE A REFUND, CREDIT OR ANY OTHER COMPENSATION FOR ANY CONTENT OR PORTION OF THE NINTENDO ACCOUNT SERVICES THAT YOU ARE NOT ABLE TO USE OR HAVE DIFFICULTY USING, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, DUE TO ANY SERVICE INTERRUPTION."
https://ancillary-proxy.atarimworker.io?url=https%3A%2F%2Faccounts.nintendo.com%2F...
Philosophy: A route of many roads leading from nowhere to nothing. -- Ambrose Bierce