First: Your ad hominem argument is not effective. And you might not realize it but the discussion is political to begin with because the authors are trying to cause hate and discontent against one group of people.
Second, I'm sorry I wasn't clear. I really do communicate poorly sometimes. My statements were intended to be so outrageous that readers would understand that I meant the opposite. What I meant is that the soil is actually still here on Earth and if we want it, we can go get it. I know that would be an enormous undertaking and the cost of doing so wold be large, but if the alternative is to not have enough food, my expectation is that we humans will find a way.
For number three, again I was attempting to use ridiculous false statements to imply the opposite. And I failed. The tribes that happened to have the land when the European migrants took it by force, themselves took it by force from other tribes. This is what has happened to every bit of land in the world many many times. In the Americas, in Europe, in Africa, in Asia, everywhere. Nobody has an ancestry that is virtuous. We are all descended from people who did what we now consider to be 'bad' things. I believe we should not punish people for acts that they themselves did not commit.
To clarify a few other things... My comments in the first note was meant to be very obviously judging individuals based on their membership in a group or location of origin, which is not something we find acceptable these days. And the negative judgement that I was stating about these individuals was that they themselves make judgements about others based on their membership in a group or location of origin. So I was doing exactly what I'm claiming it is that *they* do that is bad. Which is akin to screaming at someone else to stop screaming. And in my opinion, darned funny. But I apologize for not making it clear that I didn't intend for people to interpret my statements as true statements of my beliefs.
Why oh why does my comment look too much like ASCII art?