Comment Re:Where's the lie? (Score 1) 54
Some things aren't significantly hazardous until the levels build up, other things are harmful in ANY quantity and the only difference is how much harm.
Some things aren't significantly hazardous until the levels build up, other things are harmful in ANY quantity and the only difference is how much harm.
Toxicity is always a function of concentration. Always. Even water is toxic if ingested at high enough levels.
This (the water part) is one of those things that sounds clever at first and then obviously isn't when you think about it some more.
Sealed plastic containers are highly effective at controlling bacterial growth, for example.
We could and do use other kinds of containers with a plastic seal which is not in contact with the contents during storage.
Flossing your teeth with plastic (nylon) is universally recommended by dentists for dental health. [...] Many of these health-*positive* uses would be very difficult to reproduce with other materials.
Nylon is notable in large part because of its stability. This means it leaches less than do some other plastics. Not all plastics are created equal, and we shouldn't pretend they aren't. Nylon is one kind of thing, and Vinyls are another kind, for example.
If society wants to return to the âoestrong executiveâ model, fine, whatever. Thatâ(TM)s what we had before Nixon. Returning to it wonâ(TM)t demolish our democracy.
You can't demolish what doesn't exist, but you can play games to fool rubes into thinking it does so that you can make good use of their idiocy.
If the supreme court allows Trump a bunch of extra powers and immediately yanks them back when the next liberal president shows up, I have a big problem with that.
You should have big problems with it in the first place. Allowing Dear Leader to do whatever he wants is bad no matter what party he belongs to.
Why not be like the French who copy no one, and whom no one copies?
No one copies them for good reasons. Why they copy no one is the question.
I've had consoles since I used a Coleco Telstar to burn bars into the phosphor on a TV in the late 70s.
That was my first console as well, except I got it in the 80s. I had the really big white contoured one.
Gaming consoles just don't offer what they used to. It used to be they did things your PC couldn't. Now they're just a slightly discounted PC you're not allowed to run whatever you want on.
The first part is really my reply to you, the rest is a disclaimer
If you want the government to mandate everything, you need to move to the USSR, or maybe North Korea.
That's desperately ignorant. The US government already does regulate essentially everything, and whatever it doesn't, the states or municipalities or your local fucking HOA does. The USA is massively authoritarian and has been for over a century.
The employees' pay is more or less in equilibrium with the market for their services.
It's less. Pay attention. Also, that is not a win. It means the poor are kept poor.
Make tipping illegal
You want to make it illegal to give money to people? Congratulations, you just figured out how to make capitalism worse.
The $20M number was from an article circulated here. No clue how to find it today given how shit all the search engines are now.
Before Pocket existed I was using Scrapbook+ to store web pages as displayed. I am now using Singlefile because they destroyed the functionality Scrapbook+ used to access the filesystem. (It also gave a browser and a search for the stored pages.)
The difference of EV vs. ICE car purchase price is negligible compared to the cost of gas
I got a perfectly serviceable ICEV used for $5k. It will do 80 mph all day and it gets 30 mpg. If you buy a used EV for $5k it won't work, and if it does, it will still need a new battery. I could spend $15k and get a really nice used ICEV and still have another $25k to spend on fuel before I got to the price of the EV. Someday when there are more used EVs around then maybe they will actually be cheaper for people for whom it matters.
No i have ms in aerospace eng and a phd in physics i am not missing anything.
You're literally wrong about everything.
Energy transport of liquid fuels is very expensive. It costs more than 5% while in the USA we lose less than 5% in transmission. Getting the potential energy to the wheels through an ICE means shit efficiency, under 25% and usually under 20% because peak efficiency is reached only in a very narrow range of speeds and loads. There is generally plenty of grid capacity available at night, and when you add a lot of vehicles you can do V2G for grid stabilization and it actually IMPROVES effective capacity. Batteries are highly recyclable and batteries are being recycled RIGHT NOW AS WE SPEAK.
10 years from now the environmental impact of these cars is going to be bat shit insane.
You're a bat shit dipshit. If you actually have a Phd then I fucking weep for whatever school gave it to you.
Yes but have you considered that without this system poor people won't be able to get mcdonalds delivered to their door?
So it's a plan with no drawbacks?
I do recognize that this is an issue for the disabled, but it's unsustainable for them as well, and I reject temporary solutions that aren't backed up by permanent ones. If the plan is only to kick the can and wish for a miracle, it's a bad plan.
ICEs still have a 23 to 1 energy density than Li
That's not even wrong, it's just not how anything works. You're comparing a motor to an energy storage mechanism and also ignoring efficiency at the same time.
most of the new car buyers cannot calculate TCO and they care only about purchase price.
Monthly payments matter. Also when people are poor and can't afford big payments and the vehicles are very expensive then they wind up spending a lot in interest. TCO matters but so does monthly cost.
I think the USA & EU should start developing hybrids
They have existed for decades. What did you actually mean to say?
The primary function of the design engineer is to make things difficult for the fabricator and impossible for the serviceman.