...It's not clear if the contents of those weapons is still usable or whether ISIS has the technology to deploy them....
Oh so that's why the MIC and Fox are suddenly gushing this from their anus; they are trying to garner support for action against Isis. Pathetic.
No; they are FAILED engineers; nothing they create works properly; that's why they are trying to force the world to their will through violence, not intellect.
That was my first thought; which caliphate? the one full of bigots and nutters in the middle east; or the one full of bigots and nutters that runs the US?
so SEO for them is a combination of guesswork and research (costs which Google don't have to pay, incidentally).
Are you for real; SEO is a wankers activity that directly harms consumers. The more 'Expensive' Google make it, the better, 'cos I wont shed any tears if the whole SEO crowd end up homeless.
As for the rest of your drivel; google maps comes top of the list because it is the most popular destination for Google users. Which part of that is too hard for you to understand?
Religion and Nationalism are just flip sides of the same coin.
Neither is evil per-say; in fact both can be quite admirable; but they enable evil.
Yeah, my bad. You are on the money there; I should really have said:
.. Nationalism: the single biggest source of evil on this planet.
Qualcomm is factually wrong and under the law they can be sued for being wrong by the licensees
Yeah good luck with that.
1984; the instruction manual for our lords and masters.
Google should create a special app/site for takedown requests, and call it 'Winston'.
I don't know why the journalist is blaming Google for this ("So why has Google killed this example of my journalism?") when it's obvious they're not doing this voluntarily.
Because the people in charge are terrified of Google, the Internet, and their citizens use of it. So the BBC, kowtowing as usual to power, but still with enough journalistic testicles to make some form of protest, blames Google.. in the hope they can get away with it. Rather than pinning the blame on the corrupt shitpile of lawyers and wonks who forced Google to do this in a desperate attempt to make money the deciding factor in information control and suppression.
No; the remainder are too fuzzy to show anything clearly; or don't actually show anything inexplicable, but the up-loaders really seriously believe they do.
I was more thinking of how adding 'flesh eating' to any story makes it more exciting.
'Meat Eating' would be far less interesting, though technically more accurate.
'Flesh Eating Spiders' would have made this story worth posting.
I think they do that already; filter apps you see via a device compatibility matrix. Or is this only at a crude level to distinguish (say) Tablets from Phones, etc.
Ooooh Epstein; you have so much to learn. Maybe you should Google 'Peer review' etc.
"One day I woke up and discovered that I was in love with tripe." -- Tom Anderson
