Which part is in violation of current physics? i suspect you didn't read my post.

FTFY. The actual feat is theoretical and we lack to proper technology to do it but that doesn't mean it's impossible because the roadblocks have real solutions.

The problem of fuel can be solved by using antimatter. Our present ability to generate antimatter sucks but that doesn't mean there isn't a far more efficient method. By using antimatter reactions to accelerated to relativistic speeds, the problem of time and supplies is exponentially reduced as time comes to a crawl near C for the passengers. Resource requirements can be further reduced by placing passengers in an induced state of hibernation. However, that may be a moot point if we need to also propel a shielding mass like a captured asteroid to keep interstellar gas from impacting the ship.

Physics supports these theoretical solutions but it's all underdeveloped technologies. In the future this could change, especially if someone identifies a way to rapidly generate antimatter.

They better not be sending a probe to Wolf 359. It's not uncommon that I find myself yelling, "All hands abandon ship! I repeat, all hands abandon ship!" before I either get jabbed in the neck by Borg assimilation probes or the Enterprise explodes and I wake up in a cold sweat.

This isn't about extending one's lifespan, you dolt.

Death is inevitable but one's quality of life can vary greatly the later stages of life. Understanding aging will help us understand what can be done to improve the quality of life for all people because we all age.

However, you are free to abandon all notions of preventative healthcare and sprinkle lead flakes on your food with a few dashes of thorium for flavor.

You get more than your daily recommended amount of sawdust in hot dogs anyway.

It's important to know that he has a full-time job that is a leading role which explains why shifting focus has an impact.

I bank at credit unions because I remember 2008. Fornicate the big banks.

I also find that a low fee treasury money market fund has better yield than most savings accounts or even CDs and is exempt from state income taxes.

While it's good for the company to open their high-end manufacturing to clients rather than than merely making their own CPUs, it's bad to completely scrap the newer development process without an alternative route forward. This will definitely boost profits in the short-term but without investing in a new fab process then those profits will wane.

This does not appear to be a sustainable strategy but rather an approach to cash out. It seems to me that the best way forward would be to decouple their fabrication from their CPU development, much the same way that AMD did.

They use coded language because there are a lot of people who aren't savvy enough to recognize it's about money. Anyway, openness would be welcome. If anything, I think using coded language to be a sign of dishonesty and thus obnoxious, contemptible, and meriting punishment.

A lack of restrictions results in companies being sloppy and "expanding filing the container" much like a lack of resource restrictions has resulted in a lot people writing complex beasts in very high level languages. Take Microsoft's VSCode IDE for example, it's easy to write and extend because it's written in typescript but it is an obese monster of a program.

Google is basically whining that they cannot consume an excessive amount of resources in the tech market because it's quick and easy. Time cost money to businesses and anything costing money is heresy to a public traded company like Google. "Innovation" is just code for "it will cost use money".

This is a false equivalence because none of what you listed are intrinsically harmful. They can all be used safely without hurting anyone. The same is not true for fossil fuels.

I'm 100% in favor of a carbon tax!

If it weren't for gerrymandering and other efforts to minimize representation then I'd be on board with that. The consensus of the public is in favor taking action but the will of the people is not being represented.

Your opinion on the matter is not relevant.

Why would you assume any of that? Are you so incapable of orthogonal thought that you can only see one way of solving a problem? With such a limited approach to problems, the Voyager missions would still be on their way to Jupiter.

LOL! Insisting on specific constraints because you lack the creativity to identify a sound solution is hilariously silly.