Journal DisownedSky's Journal: som101_part1.pdf 2
A hoax? A very well executed one if it is, but that is what makes hoaxes appealing to some of the more accomplished hoaxers - fooling the experts.
To convince me, there needs to be some corroboration...
Large
Let me understand this. . . (Score:2)
Further, the fourth page in the pdf looks odd. The bold titling stands out from the page more than all the other print and it looks like the bott
Re: (Score:1)
It appears to me that someone simply photographed the book. Some pages are in poor focus. This may have been to give a more cloak-and-dagger impression. If you had it in your possession for an indefinite period of time you would definitely unclasp and scan or at least photocopy properly. The document ostensibly dates from 1954, but there is no indication of when this copy was made.