Instead of simultaneously complaining about power shortages and putting huge tariffs on insanely cheap Chinese solar panels, we just buy and use them?

Google's claim that a "harm" that "undermines public trust" isn't overtly malicious doesn't sound like an endorsement to me. Most bugs are not overtly malicious. It sounds like they recognize the problem.

I suppose a person in need of blood has recently lost a lot of it (whether by accident or by a doctor), and would presumably lose PFAS with that lost blood. So it'd probably be a wash for them when they get new blood.

The full study results are behind a paywall. Does anyone know how much higher their PFAS levels were?

If that's true, aren't you giving your PFAS to the recipient then? I'm not sure where else they'd be going.

One of us was grossly misinformed about what a cow is, and now I'm worried it was me.

The article never suggests anything should be banned, and that wasn't my reaction to it, either.

Like you said, I don't like it, and I won't go to it -- and nothing further. But I didn't know about these sites and their tendency toward misinformation until I read this article, so in that sense it was legitimately helpful.

He just has a private tomb he likes to hang out and laugh in.

It's better to have a big problem than a big problem and a small problem both.

Except this article says that two of the vaccines (the ones based on new mRNA tech) actually do prevent infections.

Forget about the article, did you even read the summary?

I feel like an old man saying this, but they need to turn the subwoofers way down. Then maybe they could turn the rest of it up.

(Upon further examination, I in fact did not know how to read the graph. I only just noticed that the x-axis scale changes, so the two slopes I mentioned are actually extremely different. This is in fact very unprecedented.)

Maybe I just don't know how to read a graph, but it actually looks like there WAS precedent around 12000 years ago. (The slope of the recent increase does look a little higher. Not by much though.) This was honestly news to me.

I still have every reason to believe the recent spike was due to human activity, but sensationalism just erodes public trust.

The fine folks at RTINGS ran some empirical tests and found that most keyboards fall into the range between 1ms and 20ms. What surprised me is how many there are that are faster than 2ms, from several different manufacturers (including Razer). There are even a few that are faster than 1ms. Source: https://ancillary-proxy.atarimworker.io?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rtings.com%2Fkeyboar...