Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:The jobs are never coming back (Score 1) 64

Nah, there will be a few dozen jobs watching the robots at any automated factory. They won't be skilled jobs, and they won't pay much. And there will be somebody sweeping up.

But people really DO want to work in factories. I know people who used to make t-shirt fabric, people who used to make bluejeans. They enjoyed their jobs, believe it or not. Those factories are closed now, shut down maybe a couple decades ago. The union (actually used to be ILGWU before it was UNITE HERE!) even closed up shop here about a decade ago, the union hall is a pain clinic now.

But yeah, the people who used to make your Levi's didn't hate their jobs. They're not big fans of the service jobs they're working now for less money, though.

Comment Re:Nawww (Score 2) 66

Putin is NOT a communist. He's a capitalist oligarch kleptocrat dictator. Russia was NEVER actually communist, but hasn't even called itself communist since 1991 - over 30 years ago.

I have no idea why this idiocy persists that Russia has any sort of connection to communism in 2025.

Comment Re:Dumbing down of users (Score 1) 138

The "ask a young person" advice was never valid.

In any age group, there are people who find computing interesting and learn about it. From a 90 year old retired CS professor to a 12 year old kid, that interest exists. But it's never been a majority of people, no matter how old they are. A young person today probably knows how to use the ticktocks, but doesn't understand the concepts behind the screen. A person who is my age probably played Oregon Trail and didn't hit return when the cursor got to the end of the line in a word processor, but had no deeper understanding.

So you're sort of wrong. I know 80 year olds who understand computing better than most 40 year olds. And there was never a generation where most people had any particular aptitude for technology.

Comment Re:One can only hope. (Score 4, Insightful) 138

The logical fallacy meaning of "begs the question" is essentially obsolete. English isn't Latin, it's not a dead language, and "begs the question" is now synonymous with "raises the question".

The use of "literally" to mean "figuratively" still bugs me, but I suspect we're going to have to live with it, it's part of the language now.

Slashdot Top Deals

Is your job running? You'd better go catch it!

Working...