Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:Don't forget that (Score 1) 77

We have to thank BASIC for Microsoft.

Sadly, you're probably right. I still have an OSI C4P, from roughly 1978. It prints the following message when it boots:

OSI 6502 BASIC VERSION 1.0 REV 3.2
COPYRIGHT 1977 BY MICROSOFT CO.

If you actually look in the BASIC ROM, it says "WRITTEN BY RICHARD W. WEILAND".

Comment Re:So goes the Win-tel monopoly (Score 2) 44

I'm so old I can remember when there was Windows/NT for the PowerPC

And DEC's Alpha

When they released Windows for the Alpha, everyone at my old job was like "Woo hoo! No more Unix!", and we started porting our software to Windows. Then we started doing benchmarks.

That was the last time anyone mentioned Windows on our servers.

Comment Re:Third-party doctrine (Score 1) 103

people who voluntarily give information to third parties ... have "no reasonable expectation of privacy" in that information

I could see their point, if it was actually voluntary, but banks, phone service, and ISPs are basically required by today's society.

Personally, I think someone (with more money than most of us) should buy that same information for all Secret Service, FBI, and DHS employees, and make it publicly available.

Comment Re:Hate (Score 1) 97

Python is the go-to for unmaintable, once-off, kludges.

Not in my experience. Just recently, we had had to connect a third-party piece of software to a messaging server (IBM MQ). I did it in Python in a couple of weekends, with about 300 lines of code. Unfortunately, we're officially a C# shop, so they paid a consultant to write a new program in C#. It took him eight months and I don't know how many lines of code.

Sorry, but I don't see how you could call 300 lines of code unmaintainable.

Comment Re:Not a fad - cameras beat phones in quality (Score 1) 142

Nearly every word you wrote is just factually incorrect.

It's funny: I have a nephew that's kind of a semi-pro photographer. (He does some photography for his company, but that's not his full-time job.) I had this exact discussion with him about five years ago, and I took your side. He said that, no, phones were actually pretty good today, and the only reason to get a real camera was if you intended to make something like a 10-foot square poster with the image.

Comment Re:Yet another reason.... (Score 1) 347

Let me be clear: I don't have a problem banning plastic bags.

Or you could do like the majority of people on the planet, and bring bags with you.

This is fine, unless you're on vacation. Some years ago, I was visiting California and bought a bunch of stuff from a convenience store. For whatever reason, they couldn't give me a bag, so I had to carry the stuff back to the hotel without one. (I wanted to just ask for my money back, but it didn't look like that was going to happen.) I made it without dropping anything, but I wouldn't want to have to do that again.

Comment Re:and the legislators who let them get away with (Score 1) 120

I've been calling for corporate and individual liability for bad software for at least 35 years.

LOL. The only kind of corporate liability I've seen in my lifetime is where the corporations get bailed out and the taxpayers pick up the tab.

No. The only way you're going to get a company to change their ways is to stop using their products and impact their bottom line.

Comment Re:Who cares if they patented it? (Score 1) 67

This sounds like one of those let's get a patent to pad our resume filings more than anything else.

To me it sounds more like Microsoft is trying to control the Python market. Add an incompatible function here, and an incompatible statement there, and in five years, everyone will be talking about how CPython sucks and everyone should be using MicroSoft Python.

Slashdot Top Deals

Life would be so much easier if we could just look at the source code. -- Dave Olson

Working...