The average person doesn't want to change their lifestyle as a result of the threat of climate change. So when politicians come along who deny its reality, they get voted for. There is no easy solution to this problem; humans are selfish, a belief long asserted by Christianity but denied by foolish idealists.
It's on days like this that I'm grateful that I'm in my sixties and probably won't suffer much as a result of this mess.
Your interpretation of my post is that I'm concerned at the jobs being created? Wow!
To be clearer: I'm denying that the state should create and enforce these rules because it's not something the state should bother with. Why? Because as a matter of respecting the freedom of individuals, it is inevitable that it will be possible for people to do stupid things. The fact that introducing new rules creates jobs, and once created those post holders have an interest in those rules being kept in place, is a detail.
Yes, those things are desirable. That doesn't create a duty on the state to enforce them, which, of course, generates lots of lovely jobs enforcing them...
Good to know you exist. As to the downvoter of your comment - is he on contract to the State of California?
He'll get to you soon...
The freedom to do stupid things would appear to be a part of what freedom means.
What aren't they admitting? Of course this applies to both Chinese and US AI firms...
The NSA takes it badly when their people are identified, let alone charged.
'That barrel you're scraping probably has a hole in the bottom by now.'
I'll try to remember that one and use it elsewhere
If Mathematicians are made redundant by AI, then a source of VERY intelligent people will be available to use to benefit the rest of us - or at least our corporate masters. This might prove to be a good thing...
'Trump choose the idiots that dropped the ball.'
The Defense Manpower Data Center is an element of the US military. So the question is whether the leadership is political or civil service, and, more significantly, why should the leadership be responsible for a security flaw by the staff. Is it really Trump's fault if a programmer doesn't block this?
https://ancillary-proxy.atarimworker.io?url=https%3A%2F%2Fxkcd.com%2F327%2F
And the fact that there are people who will claim this is why politics is so obnoxious these days. Yes, some things are as a result of decisions by the elected. But far more often it's because some low level guy made the wrong call. We had this game in the UK recently when our air traffic control system crashed. Blame the top guy? Why? Some programmer got it wrong, as did the testing regime. It's fun to score political points. DON'T - unless you can actually demonstrate a reason to do so.
Is anyone really surprised if the chatbots trot out the misinformation that is available on the internet?
Don't hit the keys so hard, it hurts.
