Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:Dirac IS better than h.264 (Score 1) 311

Don't let wavelet vs DCT fool you. That's not the hard part of making a scalable video codec, and you can drop subbands from DCT too if you code the coefficients in the right order.

For compressing an individual image, wavelets provide automatic scalability: you can downscale by a power of 2 by dropping some subbands without recompressing. But that isn't sufficient for video. If you just downscale each frame, that essentially introduces intermediate rounding in the motion compensation process, and that rounding quickly accumulates to a very ugly distortion.

H.264 has an extension called SVC which addresses such scalability. SVC isn't widely implemented because it's recent and complex (as if H.264 weren't complex enough already), but it at least in theory works. On the other hand, Dirac does not even in principle support scalability.

Censorship

Censoring a Number 1046

Rudd-O writes "Months after successful discovery of the HD-DVD processing key, an unprecedented campaign of censorship, in the form of DMCA takedown notices by the MPAA, has hit the Net. For example Spooky Action at a Distance was killed. More disturbingly, my story got Dugg twice, with the second wave hitting 15,500 votes, and today I found out it had simply disappeared from Digg. How long until the long arm of the MPAA gets to my own site (run in Ecuador) and the rest of them holding the processing key? How long will we let rampant censorship go on, in the name of economic interest?" How long before the magic 16-hex-pairs number shows up in a comment here?

Slashdot Top Deals

You have a massage (from the Swedish prime minister).

Working...