aggressively label anything contrary to DNC planks disinformation and censor anyone asking quest
I was curious, so I asked the "non-woke" AI LLM (MAGA Elon Musk's Grok) "Did the Democrats used CISA to censor Republicans?"
Here's what it said -
There is no definitive evidence that Democrats used the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) to systematically censor Republicans. Claims of this nature primarily stem from Republican allegations, particularly following the 2020 election, asserting that CISA's efforts to combat election misinformation disproportionately targeted conservative voices. These allegations are largely based on CISA's coordination with social media platforms to flag potential disinformation, which some Republicans argue suppressed their speech. For instance, a 2023 House Judiciary Committee report, led by Rep. Jim Jordan, labeled CISA as a central player in alleged federal censorship efforts, pointing to its role in sharing information with tech companies about election-related content.
However, CISA and its defenders, including former officials like Brandon Wales, have consistently denied these claims, stating that the agency's disinformation work was minimal (less than 1% of its budget) and focused on foreign threats, not domestic political speech. CISA's mission includes protecting critical infrastructure and elections from cyber threats, and its collaboration with platforms was intended to counter foreign interference, not to censor Americans. Democrats, such as Rep. Bennie Thompson, have argued that CISA's work is vital for national security and should not be politicized.
Posts on X and some conservative sources, like the Heritage Foundation's Project 2025, amplify these accusations, suggesting CISA overstepped its mandate by engaging with social media companies. Yet, these claims lack concrete evidence of direct censorship orders from Democrats targeting Republicans specifically. A 2024 Supreme Court ruling clarified that federal agencies' interactions with tech companies did not violate free speech, as they did not coerce content removal.
On the other side, CISA's actions, such as issuing advisories about foreign disinformation or coordinating with election officials, have been praised by some Republicans and Democrats for strengthening election security. The partisan divide appears to hinge on differing interpretations of CISA's role in monitoring online content, with no conclusive proof of targeted censorship against Republicans. Always approach such claims critically, as they often reflect broader political narratives rather than verified facts.
