
Journal CmdrTaco's Journal: Beta Metamod Updates 28
The first real change is that we've changed the meanings of the UI around. The old system is 'Fair' and 'Unfair' and the new system is '+' and '-'. The meanings are subtly different. You are no longer rating individual 'Insightful' or 'Troll' or whatever... you are now stating basically "Is this comment good or bad for you". Personally, since I find very few Score:5 funny comments to be actually really funny (and not just cliche memes) I '-' most of them. You are encouraged to be harsh if you don't actually think something is insightful or funny, call it such. The system encourages more of what you + and less of what you -.
You are also welcome now to do more than 10 m2 per day... however we internally have diminishing returns after 10, so you can do more, but they start to matter less and less.
There will undoubtedly be bugs so feel free to email me or vroom at slashdot if you find them. Probably next week or so we'll move this out to everyone, so your assistance is appreciated.
just to check (Score:1)
I'm confused a bit.
When I used to metamod - I would look at how the comment was modded and state if I thought the moderation was fair or not.
If I understand the new system and instructions, I'm now grading the comment itself and how that affects the moderation depends on what it was. So for example, the first comment I just saw there had been modded troll. If I hit the plus I say the comment is useful and metamod the moderation of troll as unfair? If a comment was modded insightful and I hit negative I'm
Re: (Score:2)
Not that I do much M2 anymore anyway...
Re: (Score:3)
The reason for this is that basically we can double up on moderations... if you say this is a "Good" comment by clicking "+", you are implicitly agreeing with "Insightful" and "Informative" and disagreeing with "Troll" or "Flamebait". Basically, it just lets us be more efficient with our limited M2 votes in the system.
Re: (Score:1)
if you say this is a "Good" comment by clicking "+", you are implicitly agreeing with "Insightful" and "Informative" and disagreeing with "Troll" or "Flamebait".
So if somebody rated a comment troll, but I think it's funny, I should rate a +? What if the comment could go both trollish/funny? What exactly are the repercussions for the original modders for getting disagreed with a lot? Will they get a message each time they were agreed/disagreed with, or could they just get silently banned from modding like in the current system?
Does this affect underrated and overrated? The old metamod system never included those, so those mods were abused a lot.
And what about contex
Re: (Score:3)
I think we can logically extend this to over/under as well. ALthough that's not in there yet, it certainly could be.
The 'Read More' button links to the comment in context. Maybe we should change that word.
Re: (Score:2)
Does this affect underrated and overrated? The old metamod system never included those, so those mods were abused a lot.
I second that question. I continue to be mystified why some moderations should arbitrarily be exempt from M2. What are the benefits and do the benefits outweigh the problems caused by their abuse?
I don't know if this is a bug or not... (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
by Shadow Wrought (586631)
by CmdrTaco (1)
Sorry for the late reply, but I just found out about the changes when I met
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
I was using FF 2.0.0.11. I just loaded the meta-mod page on my laptop, which is running FF 3.0.1. The comments were different, but I still see no "submit" or "finished" type button, so I assume I just hadn't waited enough time before meta-modding again. Do you just meta-moderate the comments then close the browser window to indicate you are finished?
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
When I click on the + and - buttons, they "push in." When I went back the next day and found the same comments, the ones that I had clicked + on were still "pushed in," and the same for the ones where I had selected -, or left unselected. It remembered all of my choices.
When I went to the Meta-Moderation page this morning, I thought it had given me 10 fresh comments, but I just looked at it again and it's just the first three that are new to me. The other seven are comments I meta-moderated on Saturday, wit
Re: (Score:2)
You will be shocked to learn (Score:1)
that the new metamod does not (appear to) work in IE6 - same as firehose normal - broken in IE6. It could be work but I cna't tell - the buttons didn't click, I went back in and the same comments were up for metamod - so it doesn't look like it worked at all.
If you are having a problem with not enough metamod - will dropping the IE6 users hurt?
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
I have a similar problem to GP but I'm using Firefox. There is no apparent way to leave the page "submitted". Several times I've been asked to m2, but the comments are the same ones I thought I did.
Why is there no Metamoderate button?
Re: (Score:3)
Nifty (Score:2)
It seems rather nice. Though I wish there were an easier way to see context rather than leaving the page. Can't you just load the parent and maybe a few siblings on demand?
Now if we could get comments out of the firehose for logged out folks, and I could figure out how to set the logged-in firehose to show me something other than Idle + stories already on the front page by default, that would be nice, too.
Then maybe you can move on to options that let you read all replies in a thread, no matter what it's
Re: (Score:3)
The plan is to lower the color thresholds and reduce their visibility within the normal hose in most cases- only the very best comments would be visible.
Not sure about your firehose filter issues- try creating a filter and clicking the word 'untitled'. You can name the tab and revisit it later.
'Mark all as Read' is a reasonable suggestion. Maybe someday...
Re: (Score:2)
Usually, my problem is that I want to read *replies* (e.g. children of my own posts) without having to download every comment in the story just because some AC replied to me and I'm curious to see what they said.
You're right that it's pretty easy to go *up* the tree. But sometimes I need to go down, because I want to respond to (or at least read) whoever replied to me. And they might well be at 0 just because they're an AC.
I'll try making my own firehose tab sometime. That sounds useful.
Re: (Score:3)
Named tabs (Score:2)
> Not sure about your firehose filter issues- try creating a filter and clicking the word 'untitled'. You can name the tab and revisit it later.
Actually, I can't seem to name the tab. Or to be more exact, it revert to "untitled" any time I leave the page and I can't seem to get it to save. I tried pressing enter, clicking on other things, etc.
It gives me "untit" as a suggestion just as though that were a tag box, though. Is this an FF2 bug or something? I'm on the latest version. Shouldn't be any ex
Re: (Score:3)
Duplicates (Score:2)
I saw a fair number of comments I had previously metamoderated today (yesterday being the first day I tried the new system). It remembered my choices, and had the buttons already depressed, but it ended up only giving me about 5 new comments to metamod.