The complaint, Ms. Hobley, isn't that your site/app fails at finding a match that a person is already in love with; it's that your site/app fails at even finding a match that a person could fall in love with.

Yes, your users have to work at making a lasting relationship. I think there are very few people who don't understand that on some level. But if people are finding your site/app less useful than meeting people through their hobbies, you're probably doing something wrong.

Although, to be fair, I do wonder what the actual "satisfaction rating" among users of dating websites might be.

The parts that make up the ISS were launched as payloads on other vehicles. I don't believe they were ever exposed to the atmosphere during ascent.

You might want to reread that. They're not saying it isn't true; they're just saying it doesn't matter if it is.

Lower them to what? People keep saying that, but nobody offers a number. Where's that sweet spot that gets the government more money in taxes and saves these large corporations money? Does it even exist? Advocates simply assume that it must, but nobody seems to care to know.

Actual quote: "...you could put half of Trump's supporters into what I call the basket of deplorables."

• 60.2% of eligible voters cast a vote in the 2016 presidential election.
• Trump received 45.9% of the votes cast.
• 27.6% of the eligible voting population voted for Trump.
• 27.6% / 2 = 13.8%.

(Source: Dylan Cutler's answer to What percentage of eligible voters voted for Trump?)

FBI and DHS Warned of Growing Threat From White Supremacists Months Ago

Possible? Sure. Probable? It doesn't seem likely.

How far behind the news are you? Because apparently Trump's tried several times to get folks (including Comey himself) to end the Russia investigation. His attempts are even being described as, potentially, obstruction of justice, and not just by left-leaning Trump critics.

Given such information, your best defense is that Trump might actually be stupid enough to try and cover up a non-existent crime/scandal.

Irrelevant, even if true. Trump claimed to have a "foolproof" and "absolute" plan to defeat ISIS "quickly". He has so far failed to put his plan into action, unless, of course, his "plan" was to tell his top generals to come up with a plan.

But even if ISIS is nothing to worry about, that makes his ongoing failure to defeat them "quickly" all the more pathetic.

Let's not get stupid here. It's less an underestimation of Trump than it is an overestimation of certain voting demographics. Trump didn't vote himself into office, after all.

That's a fucking bullshit metric if I ever saw one...

And also lie about it.

This is incorrect. The IRS has officially stated that there is nothing preventing Trump from releasing his tax information:

In a statement Friday [February 26, 2016], the IRS said that federal privacy rules prohibit the agency from discussing individual tax matters, but “nothing prevents individuals from sharing their own tax information.”

IRS: Trump can release tax returns, regardless of audit

This makes no sense. Tab widths aren't encoded into the file; they're editor-specific. Jim could use ts=2 and Bob could use ts=8, look at the same file, and not notice anything screwy; they'll each see indentation at their preferred width.

It pains me that "tabs for indentation, spaces for alignment" seems to be such a minority. The combination seems to solve nearly every complaint I've seen from both camps.

It's as if the desire for purity is fundamental in human nature, but manifests itself differently in each person. For some it's race; for others it's use of tabs/space. :-)

A quick Google search tells me that you're not representing the situation accurately.

The sailor isn't facing charges for simply having taken pictures of himself while on the sub; he had several pictures of classified engineering spaces: "The photos that raised red flags at NCIS and the FBI included images of various control panels, a panoramic view of the reactor compartment and a panel that showed the condition and exact location of the submarine at the time the photo was taken." (source)