I can only hope the job requirements include :

- Ability to be nearby in our data center with a large bucket of salt water ready to take action if the "safe word" is sounded.

I know this is opening a can of worms, but I got kharma to burn so why the heck not...

Disclaimer : I work for a company which deals exclusively with firewalls and internet security including integration of both Cisco and Check Point products.

If you have a few firewalls, knock yourself out with the CLI. If you have a massive enterprise setup where not only do you have tiers of individuals who control what rules do and don't get put on the firewalls, but you also have S/Ox compliance to think about then get yourself a GUI driven system with proper workflow management. I know you're proud of your Unix mastery and your CLI Jedi powers and all. But the only thing really accomplished by doing everything via CLI is that you make yourself the one guy who the company is screwed without. Great for your job security, horrible for the company.

The number of times I've had to spend hours, sometimes days, troubleshooting network integration issues with someone only to find that "Oh, when I was manually editing the config for one of our Ciscos I forgot to put this particular IP/port combo in an allow for the ACL" was the root of the problem is all I need to know to verify that a well written GUI, and well written graphical log/event tracker are essential to the large enterprise.

And Cisco isn't the only one who can handle an enterprise security infrastructure. The current Check Point line features much of what you're talking about, including building a graphical map of your network based on the information you give it so you can see how things are arranged and working.

As the parent poster said though, Belkin and LInksys are not firewalls. They are NAT capable home routers with limited ACL capability.
Linksys :: Corporate security
Yorkshire Terrier :: Trained Russian Bear cavalry.

I believe the push for 3d movies is primarily because the major studios have realized how little really original good new product they have to offer.

For TV manufacturers it's because whereas the jump from standard def to high def was a distinct quality improvement to the point that people did it, they now realize these people have no reason to do the "every few years upgrade" cycle that their bottom lines desperately want. So they have to come up with a new "innovation" to get people to buy new TV sets.

Of course.. I could be crazy.

First, if employees would have to get them when they got new jobs would this be something done in the field or something someone would have to go to an office to pick up? If the latter than exactly how much do you think immigrant workers who cross the border to work in the fields will stop by a government office to register?

If it's the former what stops anybody from creating a second indentity for themselves by simply getting a job, saying they have no ID, and getting a card? Or stops someone who is here from mexico (many of whom don't have birth certificates they could find or any documentation) from simply creating identities ad hoc?

Also, for the sake of comic relief, can we call it a Multipass?

So those of us who got in on the G1 early (as in around xmas last year) still have the better part of a year to wait if we want it at a reasonable price. YAY status quo!

Before I found out it would be essentially another "buy into a contract or pay a half a grand for it" phone. You could get a completely unlocked G1 as well if you wanted to pay a much higher price and go through the dev phone procurement process. Also it's Edge only on AT&T, so not truly carrier agnostic.

The Google site for it earlier couldn't even sell you the T-mobile plan, so it was grayed out, same for the Verison and Vodaphone options which aren't available yet.

So essentially , it's a new phone on T-mobile.

I remember when it was a supposed to be a phone you could just get a data only plan for and use VOIP and Google voice on for a reasonable price. Apparently that was the flash and hype.

I think around the time CNN saw Fox staking out the conservative-centric news angles, and MSNBC staking out the liberal-centric news angles they knew they were somewhat screwed. In at attempt to differentiate themselves they embraced the "let the people own it" mantra and started up all the tweeting crap and the iReporter stuff.

They're trying to find a niche, and not doing a good job of it if you go by the ratings. Unfortunately they have been the closest left to a "neutral" cable news channel. If they go under it will be a somewhat sad day.

When the GM at my first AD&D game explained the difference between INT and WIS....

I have yet to see a system that could effectively run XP that couldn't also run Windows 7. This includes :

My old rig which is old and actually got a substantial performance bump going to Windows 7 (4g ram and a E6300 processor, older nvidia card)
A Thinkpad X32 laptop which is also old by laptop standards (only drawback is no Aero glass interface due to older pixel shader)

In the vast majority of cases, if you can run XP, you can run Windows 7. Specifically the operating thresholds for it are lower than Vista because they streamlined some of the extraneous stuff Vista was hogging resources for.

And even in the case that someone needs to upgrade the amount of RAM, or video card in the system that's still a huge shade cheaper than "buy a Mac which is specifically only manufactured by one company and you will pay a pricing premium for"

I have to disagree with you on this. The ads do clearly state that it's 3G coverage. And the difference between 2G and 3G for heavy data use Smartphone owners is a very significant one. This ad is less deceptive than the AT&T one claiming the "fastest 3G network" when it is only faster because it's smaller and doesn't have to deal with coverage in spottier areas.

If you want to argue that it gives people the impression that the phones don't have any coverage even though they state it's 3G coverage areas the maps are talking about then you should also talk to Apple about the "If I'm going to move things, why not move to a Mac?" ads which neglect to mention that the difference between moving Xp to Win 7 as opposed to XP to Mac is the fact that you also have to buy a completely new computer on top of a new OS (making it just a tad more expensive...)

As a note from personal experience.

Going XP 32 bit to Win 7 64 bit - The "export your files and settings" thing actually WORKS now. Fresh install, reinstall office and firefox, import the previous settings all worked flawlessly (including ALL my FF add ons...). Most painless Windows upgrade I can remember.

I openly dare you to substitute "Fox News" for "slashdot" and e-mail this to Rham Emanuel. Just to see how many watch lists you end up on ;)