Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
User Journal

Journal Journal: It is 2025 and Slashdot doesn't support IPv6?

I've been migrating all my stuff to IPv6 because I'm retarded and felt like (another) winter project.

So I have a Debian VM that is IPv6-only for testing things out, general browsing, etc. and see that Slashdot doesn't support IPv6? One would think a tech site would have been onboard with this years ago.

Comment Re:Musk should thank his lucky stars for this (Score 0) 222

If you want to kill competition in an industry, tax it enough that only the large corporations can survive the loss, and add some complicated regulations in for extra effect.

The notion that this is about helping SpaceX kill off their competition is absurd.

This is Musk Derangement Syndrome. The Brandon administration is simply trying think of every way to go after Musk. He pissed them off. He dismantled the branch office of Pravda that the old Twitter was building for The Blob. He fired all of the CIA and FBI spooks on Twitter's payroll, who were busy censoring and shadowbanning anyone who was engaing in wrongspeech. But the worst of it: he has all but explicitly endorsed Trump. Just read his tweets. He's been fully red-pilled. Not a day goes by that he doesn't rag on all of the left's sacred cows: environmentalism, transgenderisms, the illegal alien invasion from all the South American shitholes, et. al.

This is why they're doing this. This is why they have a bunch of lawsuits going against Tesla, for a bunch of bullshit reasons. This is why every time the Brandon administration tries to puff up the US's fledging EV industry they always fluff only Detroit's automakers, and conspicuously ignoring the elephant in the room.

And this is why they're doing this, that's all.

Comment Ever been on Stackoverflow, lately? (Score 1) 130

It's not paper vs. screen, per se.

It's just that the screen also gives access to a wealth of information on the Intertubes.

Including many flashy web sites that will assure you that you do not need to waste years of your life studying a particular subject using a traditional textbook, with an organized, well-developed, logical curriculum that introduces and explains each progressively complicated topic, one chapter at a time, in a disciplined manner.

No, all you have to do is take a few quizzes, or solve a bunch of dumb coding puzzles, in order to become an instant Guru, in whatever topic you're pursuing.

Come over to Stackoverflow, and witness this phenomenon happen in real time. Watching all the refugees come rolling in, from various coding puzzle sites, pleading for help in just solving one more coding puzzle for them, before they finally become an instant uberhacker.

Comment No, AI will not turn you into an uberhacker (Score 2) 127

The push and hype for AI-based developing mostly comes from 2nd-rate developers who see AI as their great hope for finally mastering the craft and becoming rock star uberhackers. They also watch Star Trek too much, and are having multiple orgasms at the thought of saying "Computer: write me a node.js web server that implements a shopping cart", and have the code appear instantly before their eyes.

All the AI tools I've seen are little bit more than glorified predictive type-ahead tools. I can see how they can save quite a bit of time with rote typing, but that's pretty much it, nothing more beyond a glorified menu. But, guess what: you still have to use your brain to figure out which option to pick. An AI is not going to make the choice for you.

The remaining AI tools boil down to nothing more than producing a fill-in-the-blanks templates. The starting template is nothing special, and nothing that requires a lot of intelligence to write. But it does take the same amount of intelligence to figure out what goes into all the blank spots.

So, sorry, all of you who hope that AI will turn you into a supercoder. It's not going to happen, sorry. And the few of you who are worried about the Ai taking your job: there's nothing to worry about. It should not take a great thinker to conclude that before an AI can surpass a human brain in some measurable way, someone has to actually demonstrate that an AI surpasses a human brain, in some measurable way. Where's the evidence?

(Disclaimer, I also watch Star Trek too much, but I also watched Bill Shatner's SNL skit)

Slashdot Top Deals

/earth: file system full.

Working...