Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Old boss once told me.. (Score 5, Insightful) 87

Old boss once told me, he'd set up a complete call center for a US client in India, for less than he paid any one of his engineers, maybe 10 years before he and I worked together.

Just move to India already, Google. It's cheaper, and no burdensome regulations. You'll be free to exploit your workers far more than you do here.

I mean, that's Google's purpose, right? Pay as least as possible for everything, including people and talent?

Comment Re:PE can fuck off (Score 1) 39

Exactly what happened to my 2nd IT job. Clipboard-bearing suits came and were shown everything. 2 months later I left. 2 months after that the announcement came that the company had been sold off to a PE firm.

That PE took a 50-year old, money-making medical firm (billing, staffing, etc) and promptly ran it into an iceberg. After the carnage, it was sold yet again.. and one more time.

Now they exist in name only, a sub of a sub of a sub of some other company.

Getting bought out is almost universally undesirable. Happened to my 3rd IT job, and now they don't even exist any more, not even as 'just a name.'

The morning we all walked in and all the door signs showed the new owner's name was quite demoralizing.

Left not too long after that.

Comment Re:No tribute? (Score 2) 13

The orange guy has given out multiple pardons to people convicted of fraud, corruption, and drug dealing after they "donated" to his campaign.

The most recent example is the former governor of Puerto Rico who plead guilty in a federal corruption case. The daughter gave over $3 million to Trump's PAC, MAGA, after which the pardon was given.

The OP was merely mentioning that with all the other criminals getting pardons after paying their tribute, apparently this group didn't give theirs.

Comment Re:Backwards into stupidity we go (Score 2, Informative) 307

We have 8 billion+ people on the planet. We can afford to lose a billion or so and not affect our ability to advance science. Having fewer people would definitely enhance wellbeing as there would be less pollution which means cleaner air and water. Less trash would be produced as well.

Clearly we had no problem with scientific advancements when our population was lower. With what we have now, why would you think fewer people would change that?

Slashdot Top Deals

All laws are simulations of reality. -- John C. Lilly

Working...