Click bait is where you bury a stupid lede.

"Right, but they're suing over copyright infringement, not trademark infringement. They're using only using the trademark infringement to prove that the copyrighted works were encoded/copied into the training data."

If your description is accurate then in fact they do need to show the trademark infringement because it is part of their argument.

"Why or why not?"

In your specific example here, what matters is first whether or not the result is sufficiently similar to infringe on Nike's trademark, and second whether there was intent.

I support them whether I believe that's a fact or not.

I don't believe you're not a maggot, though.

Let's not forget Leon violating his student visa.

Thanks for getting what I said about paper, too. Some people will stop [thinking] at nothing to find something to which they might object.

I hear they have a treatment for your tyrant defense syndrome, it involves sticking a light bulb up your ass and injecting bleach.

The answers are continually getting worse, too. If you ask it about anything technical it will hallucinate functionality that doesn't exist! Go to this settings page, click this thing... it's not there! It also refuses to answer any questions which are actually interesting, and it absolutely refuses to provide useful numbers or percentages. What a festering worthless pile of shit Google has created there.

Nope, you just proved you're not missing any important context there, because you got it.

If you don't think the medium matters then there's no potential for a meeting of minds here. It matters to people who aren't you, and you can either accept that or not.

People paying for newspapers got a tangible thing with intrinsic value (bird cage paper, oil change mat, emergency bumwad) for a small price, and an experience that they do not get with a website because everything is samey when experienced in the browser. There's nothing else quite like reading a newspaper, although that went downhill too — cheaper paper, smellier ink, same-ier news. When most papers are mostly just reposting the AP on paper, why not just read the AP online?

The feds have got to love how much data Google grabs on everyone, they can surely get any of it for a price, and it's not even their money. Even if we were doing antitrust these days (which we mostly aren't) they wouldn't want to break up Google any more than they do Microsoft or Apple.

What's the news media got left? Go full Idiocracy in a bid for eyeballs?

Even were it true, has this clown (the GP) seen the current guy?

In this case, every action he's taken supports only one end goal: Doing as much damage as possible to the United States and Ukraine, up to and including the destruction of both if possible. Now who 1) would want to make that happen, 2) controls Trump's purse strings because they're the only ones who will bank with him, and 3) has a lot of embarrassing intelligence on him?

Speaking of similar issues, how did this age?

Yes, I'm talking about Discover, which is the default when you go to bsky.app. If it's totally untargeted that explains why it sucks.