Talk about a situation. Somebody somewhere made a braindead idea that attacking the whole of Iran, rather than targeting a specific thing. So now the we aer on record as planning to end an entire civilization - sounds A lot like advance notice of Genocide, the rest of the world must now obey the smallest whim of the Superpower.

Now just between us, this was some sort of victory? Shutting off our one time allies fuel supplies, and looks like it might get worse.

I'm on record as saying I understand that the Democrats made some weird decisions that cost them the 2024 elections, but if anyone voted for Trump and his merry band, you support use of nuclear weapons against anyone, support subjugation of religion if they do not support everything you want to do. and anything else the stable genius wants to do. I'll bet he tries to declare martial law with use of deadly force before this is over, Demands deadly force against all Citizens who do not obey his orders. And now, let us pray from teh Wholly babble:

“And I will strike down upon thee with great vengeance and furious anger those who attempt to capture and destroy my brother, “And you will know my call sign is Sandy 1, when I lay my vengeance upon thee.”

Words straight from teh mouth of Gawd.

It is mature, and no one wants to be like Windows 11.

Trump Victory fuel?

Republican faith based fuel? Maybe the EU can fuel their jets with thoughts and prayers.

In reality, unless he stopped, the rest of the world is going to decide that war with the USA is inevitable, Because the Party of trump are not going to stop him. Amnd despite the rhetoric, the USA cannot subdue the entire world.

Well, around 30 years old, men start to think with their big head, not their little one.

True about the ability to have casual sexual intercourse.

As a not-young guy who is sexually active, my wife and I have had discussions about this. I could go out and find a woman to have casual sex with. A bar most likely. using the 10:1 method - If I approach 10 women, I'm going to get laid by one.

She would have an easier time, could be as little as 1:1 so she can be pretty picky. Both of us look okay, are fit and attractive enough.

But really, casual sex really ain't all that. If a woman wants to get impregnated at a club or bar, it isn't that hard, but then there is the single mom problem. Few men today want to raise another man's children.

In the end, most everyone wants to find a loving partner, and it seldom happens via casual sex.

In great irony, looking at the statistics, I'm getting laid so much more often than over 60 percent of young men who should be gelling sex regularly. I guess infinitely more, since those guys aren't in relationships or with women at all.

When I was their age.......

Consumers are going to stop buying everything eventually. Because the enshittification isn't limited to a single vendor. And there does not seem to be any market pressure to provide more features and more services for less cost. We're on a direct route to rentier capitalism, and I'm afraid I have no suggestions on how to avoid ending up there.

California Communist Democrats don't understand the meaning of the 2nd Amendment: "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." ***SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED*** Requiring state approved software to be used with 3D printers to prevent the creation of gun parts is not only a violation of the 2nd Amendment, it's also prior restraint of free speech, a violation of the 1st Amendment.

Its right up there with excessive sugar in breakfast cereal for things we should stop tolerating.

That's typical in most countries. Famously in the UK, but also much of Europe. And this concept of Free Speech has arrived in the US. Well really, it's been like this in the US for as long as I've been alive, but I think people are starting to realize what load of hogwash the promise of free speech is.

Stuff that isn't compliant will be easily available anywhere near one of California's major ports. Many of these ports are significant foreign-trade zones that not only avoid Federal customs inspections, they of course completely side-step any California state regulation thanks to the supremacy clause.

A nation-wide ban might be more effective. But really, replacing your 3D printer's software with a different package is trivial and often a prerequisite to even getting it set up in the first place.

This law belongs in the dust bin along with California's age verification requirements for devices. It's bone headed legislation that isn't going to yield any positive results, at best it inconveniences everyone, at worse it gums up the economy and puts California beyond other markets.

Paragraphs are 3-5 sentences chief. It's actually kinda rude.

Anyway Biden passed way more legislation in 4 years than trump will pass in 8. That's called "working with Congress" and the fact you used right-wing media fabrications to argue it shows me you really don't have anything worth talking about.

But hey enjoy your war in Iran, you voted for it.

This is a bit, its 2026 and this is a bit and this is why you are posting as AC because you know this isnt true.

After you scroll down to my listing, it really isn't all that unique. Unless you are into checkboxes.Because as I'll show you, every mission can be unique after some metric. If I went to space, I'd be the first Hungarian/Polish/Italian mix to ever go. (note among my listing, of female astronauts, they have many checked as first person or female of their country. If you see my posts on Artemis II, you will note that Christina Koch is highly qualified, and I would add, perhaps the most qualified person on the voyage. Victor Glover, the male of African descent who is the pilot, is likewise highly qualified. They are Astronauts, they are elite, females have performed every mission in space, from specialist to pilot, to commander.

Who is pretending? We definitely do not live in a color blind society. And make no mistake, if you believe in race in any form, you are by definition a racist. Don't like it? You are welcome to your opinion, I respect that, and I have mine based on Science and biology,I see DNA evidence that shows that homo sapiens sapiens is a species, with extremely small and insignificant genetic differences.

And sexism abounds as well.

Okay, I might be a little insane, and I'm going to stop after the female Astronauts - I'm on vacation, and I don't need to go into the "race" of astronauts Valentina Tereshkova - first woman in space

Svetlana Savitskaya, Sally Ride, Kathryn D. Sullivan, Anna Lee Fisher, Margaret Rhea Seddon, Shannon Lucid, Bonnie Jeanne Dunbar, Mary L. Cleave Ellen S. Baker, Kathryn C. Thornton, Marsha Ivins, Linda M. Godwin, Helen Sharman, Tamara E. Jernigan, Millie Hughes-Fulford, Roberta Bondar, Nancy Jan Davis, Mae Jemison, Susan J. Helms, Ellen Ochoa, Janice E. Voss, Nancy J. Currie, Chiaki Mukai, Yelena V. Kondakova, Eileen Collins, Wendy B. Lawrence, Mary E. Weber, Catherine Coleman, Claudie Haigneré, Susan Still Kilrain, Kalpana Chawla, Kathryn P. Hire, Janet L. Kavandi, Julie Payette, Pamela Melroy, Peggy Whitson, Sandra Magnus, Laurel B. Clark, Stephanie Wilson, Lisa Nowak, Heidemarie Stefanyshyn-Piper, Anousheh Ansari, Sunita Williams, Joan Higginbotham, Tracy Caldwell Dyson, Barbara Morgan, Yi So-yeon, Karen L. Nyberg, K. Megan McArthur, Nicole P. Stott, Dorothy Metcalf-Lindenburger, Naoko Yamazaki, Shannon Walker, Liu Yang, Wang Yaping, Yelena Serova, Samantha Cristoforetti, Kathleen Rubins, Serena Auñón-Chancellor, Anne McClain, Beth Moses, Christina Koch, Jessica Meir, Sirisha Bandla, Sian Proctor, Hayley Arceneaux, Yulia Peresild, Kayla Barron, Jessica Watkins , Nicole Aunapu Mann , Anna Kikina, Rayyanah Barnawi, Jamila Gilbert, Kelly Latimer, Keisha Schahaff, Anastatia Mayers, Jasmin Moghbeli, Loral O'Hara, Namira Salim, Ketty Maisonrouge, Lina Borozdina , Jeanette J. Epps, Marina Vasilevskaya, Sarah Gillis, Anna Menon, Wang Haoze, Nichole Ayers, Jannicke Mikkelsen, Rabea Rogge, Zena Cardman, Patricia Robertson (died before spaceflight in accident), Christa McAuliffe, Jennifer Sidey-Gibbons Backup Artemis II, Sophie Adenot, Rosemary Coogan, Meganne Christian, > Meganne Christian, Anthea Comellini, Sara García Alonso, Carmen Possnig, Amelie Schoenenwald, Nicola Winter, Katherine Bennell-Pegg, Mariam Fardous, Christina Birch, Deniz Burnham, Jessica Wittner, Lai Ka-ying,

And for the checkboxes? some of them are pretty funny, other than the young lady who was the first to fly into space wearing a prosthesis, a cancer survivor, and I wish her long life and good health. Even a crazy like me can't begrudge that.

But things like being the first to play a violin in space, or the 20th woman to do a spacewalk? If we keep doing that, will we have a big celebration fort the 10,0046th woman to walk in space?

You specifically said I hate women when you wrote

" I call BS. Do you have any evidence for this claim beyond misogyny?"

This will be important

Yes, I used the word quota, and that was incorrect. The supreme court has made a ruling that specific quotas for race would be unconstitutional Gratz vs Bollinger https://ancillary-proxy.atarimworker.io?url=https%3A%2F%2Fsupreme.justia.com%2Fcas... Gender was also noted, but in manner of gender "was but one of numerous factors [taken] into account in arriving at [a] decision" because "[n]o persons are automatically excluded from consideration; all are able to have their qualifications weighed against those of other applicants" in case Cf. Johnson v. Transportation Agency, Santa Clara Cty., 480 U.S. 616, 638 (1987) https://ancillary-proxy.atarimworker.io?url=https%3A%2F%2Fsupreme.justia.com%2Fcas...

So no, there cannot be a quota. There can be goals, as I stated in another post. s do.

If I might note, you are using rhetoric as opposed to intent, even way back when you said I hated women. You used the term misogyny. Do you disagree?

Let's do some analysis - since in the last decade, there has been an effort to attract more men as they have leaned out of University to a significant extent. Here is a report from Shayna Medley a former recruiting officer from speaks of being told to hire more men to correct that imbalance. Here is the Hechinger Report with background: https://ancillary-proxy.atarimworker.io?url=https%3A%2F%2Fhechingerreport.org%2Fan... And here is her paper. https://ancillary-proxy.atarimworker.io?url=https%3A%2F%2Fjournals.law.harvard.e...

So now that men are leaning out, and Universities are attempting to bring gender diversity, it is disfavoring women, who already hold a large gender advantage.

Okay, but now let us speak of preferential education of men to correct gender imbalances. In the educational world, men have become an underrepresented minority

If I express that gender goals in opposing a 50/50 mix makes me a misognyst, What do we say about university efforts to achieve a gender mix. And people claiming that hurts women?

She claims that "In their effort to maintain a relatively balanced gender distribution on their campuses, admissions offices are preferencing weaker male applicants over their more-qualified female counterparts. So in an educational system in which women already had a large and growing percentile advantage, Universities are allowing unqualified men into college.

Wat do you think? Is she correct? Is it within the realm of possibility that a system that as one person notes, prefers men, that other's might give a preference to women?

Because there is a problem.

I interact with other users of similar workflow. We compare notes, we share boots on the ground experiences. If I try something out it works or does not work well, I share it with them, and the other way around as well. A cohort told me "you really have to use an M series machine for Photoshop and any rendering you do like AI sharpening" Bought one with a sweet tradein on my Intel Mac, and he was so right.

I have to trust them first. The people I network with have that boots on the ground experience, every day, and We trust each other's judgement. I've seen too many people with personal prejudices to automatically trust someone who provides benchmarks.

To me, and I might be completely wrong on this, but I've seen a lot of benchmarking over the years that serves best as bragging rights. Been doing this computing thing since 1979, and seen a lot of it.

After what happened in Hungary JD may end up being liberalism's greatest warrior.