Comment Re:Hahahahah (Score 2) 38
What consequences have been faced by people who shared their DNA? I've heard of theories with a company getting sold, but haven't heard of it actually affecting anyone yet.
What consequences have been faced by people who shared their DNA? I've heard of theories with a company getting sold, but haven't heard of it actually affecting anyone yet.
I figured this would be the reaction from the luddites and preppers on this site. But no one has said why they're so worried about this other than boomer paranoia.
The terms state they can't sell your data to other companies. Worried about accidental leaks? I think a large tech company will do a better job protecting my data than secretary Karen who is my doctor's IT person.
Many people don't have the time to go to the doctor at all and are already using AI for medical advice. Much better than zero medical advice.
The robot vacuum market doesn't affect my bottom line. The idea of maybe theoretically paying more for my next robot vacuum doesn't affect me. I'll still use Amazon because it makes my life easier.
Yeah, good thing we have a random Chinese company listening to us instead of Amazon
Oh, never mind, I get it. Sam Altman is the crypto grifter
What are you referring to here? What happened between Microsoft and Deepseek?
who have not used it*
Exactly the opposite at my company. The most anti-AI are the ones who have used it because they refuse to learn anything new. These people also struggle to use their web browser and their email client.
From "it has no value" to "it's self destructive". You don't even know what point you're trying to make. An LLM is more coherent than you.
Millions of people use them every day at this point. To deny the value at this point is like being a young earth creationist. A religious determination to be a luddite
Wild 180 to talk shit about people that 'pretend they are creating a new life form' and then spend an entire paragraph anthropomorphizing LLMs
I fail to understand why so many people here have negative opinions about AI coding assistance. I chalk it off as a basic resistance to change.
Resistance to change is certainly a part of it. But also, some of these people are so old it's actually hard for them to learn something new. I work with people that can't figure out their iPhone. There's no hope for them to understand and utilize something this different.
Right, because technology never improves
A year ago: 'It's fancy autocomplete. It will never do anything useful'
Now: 'Those people losing their jobs never deserved them to begin with'
With all the fancy scientists in the world, why can't they just once build a nuclear balm?