I do not OWN a wallet. Plastic is in the slots of the phone cover. No place for bills or coins... It's been years since I have paid in cash here in Finland.

No need to invent new terms. In english language, the word Artificial has many meanings - and this is why "AI" is such a controversial term.

It seems that the Artificial in "Artificial intelligence" is commonly understood to mean "man made", but I would argue it originally meant either of these other interpretations: Artificial in "Artificial Smile" means fake. And artificial in "artificial gun sound" means something imitating a gun sound.

Exactly my point, it has been used for a long time. No need to mention it, unless you want to do marketing and ride the AI wave/hype.

Wonderful news, if this really leads to a cure. But I couldn't help myself thinking that this would have been a much better and convincing story if only they had left out the "with AI" part. These days, anything with an AI angle reads more like marketing text instead of scientific/medical news.

I would argue that even though Linux originated as a single person's passion project, it quickly became a joint effort, with ever growing contributor base.

Similar argument can be said on the SCIENCE behind neural networks. I read a good book on the history of the subject - since about 2010, as the interest started growing in neural networks, the leading minds insisted that their employers let them publish their findings (i.e. science). This is the reason that others have been able to build on that expertise, in a not dissimilar way from the Linux project.

For example, the idea of transformer architecture, which is behind all current LLMs, originated from Google - and was published as open science for others to build on: https://ancillary-proxy.atarimworker.io?url=https%3A%2F%2Farxiv.org%2Fabs%2F1810.048... . Later on, as more and more vendors have turned closed source, these Deepseeks kind of re-enable this long lasting trend in neural network research.

No, he is not, why would you think that? He is talking about Linux kernel, how it blossomed as open source project - using it as an example of a successful open source project.

You have it backwards. Tariffs are paid by the importer and very probably that cost is carried over to the consumer.
And EU exports many items that are quite crucial to US economy, i.e. there are no easy substitutes - thus, this hurts US economy.

Most exported goods from EU to US? Top of the list:
1. Medicinal and pharmaceutical products
2. Medicaments
3. Motor cars (BMW, Mercedes Benz, Audi, Ferrari, Porche, Lamborghini, etc...)
4. Aircraft and associated equipment (e.g. Boeing 777/787 and F35 use Rolls-Royce engines)
And the list goes on. Good luck redesigning the F35 !

As that one probably went "woosh" over most people heads here, let me highlight here that Google Deepmind's AlphaFold2 developers won the Nobel prize for Chemistry last year: https://ancillary-proxy.atarimworker.io?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.nobelprize.org%2Fprizes%2Fchemistry%2F2024%2Fpress-release%2F

An interesting Argumentum ad hominem. If anything, it highlighted that you are not very comfortable with your own argumentation. Besides, I'm probably way older than you...

I have thousands of books in my bookshelves. Bought used and new. There are no licenses restricting on how I use them. I can lend them to anyone, I can sell them. But if I train an LLM form my own use (local network only), I wouldn't be allowed to feed the LLM with those books?

Why would you say that an artificial brain (say, neural network) would need special right to process information readily available, but a real brain would not need it? Your thinking ability is partially based on those books that you read as a child and in school. Why wouldn't artificial brain be allowed to be fed information in a similar way?

For those interested, The European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) has a good selection of these Deep Learning models (e.g. from Microsoft, Deepmind) fed with real data - you can check and compare the resulting forecasts here. Weather forecasts

There is active research on how to recycle those blades. E.g. Finland's Reverlast is convert used blades into floating docks.

It this is correct, then this begs a question: why would this affect accuracy of the AI results at all?
Shouldn't it just be slower producing it (not less accurate), when run on a slower machine?

"which some scientists refer to as a "second brain." " So gut feelings are actually real thoughts?

I learned about radio interference with AM - revving the engine in our old car would generate a similar sound (going higher pitch with higher revs in the engine) on an AM frequency listened on the car radio.