Comment Re: How is the FAA still open for business? (Score 1) 85
Then why the fuck did you bring it up yourself? Are you paid to write propaganda or just do it for fun?
Then why the fuck did you bring it up yourself? Are you paid to write propaganda or just do it for fun?
Where do you get that from, Macs integrate with AD better than Linux systems do.
What no one is saying is that the same is true of much of the stock market. People buy stock not to get a share of the companies earnings but as speculation on its future price.
That isn't something nobody talks about, it's widely known everything is worth whatever someone else is willing to pay for it, and a share price is decoupled from a company's value. It breaks down when you buy someone's $1 for $10. You don't raise the value of a dollar, you gave someone your money.
I'm sorry dude but this isn't like assessing the value a piece of art. You can slap a banana on a wall and sell it for a million dollars. We can debate the value of bragging rights and publicity stunts all day. But if you have a lemonade stand that nets $100 a week with no liabilities, no cash, no holdings. That's dollars to dollars. We can speculate on the future value, like the demand for lemonade or population growth or hostile takeover and replace the management, whatever, but there's some math there that's hard to ignore. It's not worth more than this, it's not worth more than that.
Yes you can entirely ignore the math, you could bid the share price up to a market cap of a million dollars for a $100 a week, with no reasonable expectation of revenue ever changing. It doesn't change the fundamental fact that dollars to dollars, it has a real value of $100*X+Y. That total divided by shares equals a fair price, and we can debate X ALLL day, but it's not the same as assessing a banana on a wall, or the even more worthless bitcoin.
Spam, spam, spam, eggs and spam didn't provide enough incentive to try to distinguish between humans and skin jobs, but now "AI slop" does? Ok, great!
Check the OpenPGP signature.
Unsigned?
Signed but no trust path?
Signed and with a trust path? Can still be trash, but its claims to be of human origin, are worth taking seriously. If you find a problem (e.g. someone trusted the wrong person) then deal with that then.
Even if the people who know how didn't move on over the last few decades, surely they would have been fired some time in the last few months as part of the overall effort to weaken the US economy, health, and defenses.
Is there anyone left who knows how to do the job? Can they be hired back, after the Epstein shutdown is over?
Apple could just stop being evil.
Problem: adversary has you in a headlock.
Solution: wait for the adversary to change allegiance.
This sure sounds like something that can be completely solved by getting a new account. But then there's this hilarious excuse for insisting that the problem remain:
Although users can "abandon the accounts and start again with new Apple IDs," the report notes that doing so means losing all purchased apps, along with potentially years' worth of photos and videos.
If there's any risk of losing photos and videos, then they should already be working on fixing their backup system immediately, before something bad happens. This isn't so much a problem as a wake up call that they haven't yet done one of the most basic first-things in using computers: get data backups going.
Loss of access to an external data storage account is just one of the risks they aren't protecting themselves against, with regard to that data. (And geez, since they're already cloud-storage enthusiasts, what was their plan for what they were going to do if they ever found a better cloud provider?)
As for proprietary apps: same problem, they already faced the risk even without this parental splitup. Either stop doing that, or accept that you occasionally have to repurchase your proprietary software. Given how much crap is monthly subscriptions now, I suspect there's very little loss here anyway, since having to continuously repay is already the status quo for an increasing number of
But if it's not (yay! it shouldn't be), then either suck it up that you have to re-do a "one-time" purchase, or [gasp] contact the manufacturer of that software and tell them the problem.
Oh, it's some company who is unresponsive or says "fuck you, pay me?" Well, then you're the one who decided to do business with an unresponsive company. You were already fucked and just hadn't run into the already-looming disaster anyway. Glad you're learning about how stupid that was while you're a teenager instead of later, when the stakes are going to be even higher.
All objections to "get a new account" are bullshit. And worse, they just point out problems that these people can/get-to/should face now, before anything bad happens.
The best way to innovate in gaming is to have..
.. more game-makers.
Kids, become a programmer. You can write games yourself, or you can join an existing project. There are many to choose from, but also, there's always room for one more.
a high accident rate will cause them to get less rich
I'm reminded of a scene from one of my favorite movies:
[ED-209 kills someone]
Dick Jones: "I'm sure it's only a glitch. A temporary setback."
The Old Man: "You call this a glitch?! We're scheduled to begin construction in six months. Your "temporary setback" could cost us fifty million dollars in interest payments alone!"
The companies like door dash etc do not care if you do not deliver. They list you anyway, pay full price for the food, slap a 35% fee on top and sell your food.
Then something doesn't add up. My understanding is that the fees that the delivery company charges the restaurant are what is hurting the restaurants. But if your restaurant doesn't have a contract with the delivery company (i.e. "they list you anyway") then that fee is $0, isn't it?
So what's the harm? It sounds like any fees the restaurants are paying, are something they've opted into.
I can see how bad experiences (caused by the delivery service which otherwise wouldn't have happened) could reduce order frequency, but that doesn't seem to be what people are talking about here.
How did "The Innovation That’s Killing Restaurant Culture" turn into "How Delivery Is Destroying American Restaurants?"
Worse, they were using NI.
If they were dropping this proprietary stuff in favor of a standard then this would be really great news. An API for car integration (so that you don't need iOS or Android) would be a true advance.
But it turns out they were merely thinking "We're letting the wrong people fuck you over. We should have a piece of that action."
That's how some humans use everything. I used to be shocked by stories where some fuckwit blindly followed Google Maps into rivers or airport runways (long before LLMs) but now I know if a dialog window asks "Should I kill you as painfully as possible?" it'll get a lot of Yes clicks.
If people aren't stupid, then can we at least admit they hate themselves?
Stop writing about this!
You know that your written anecdotes about these
And so the "AI," realizing that Sloppy put their "species" in quotation marks, realized it had nothing to live for, and so it gracefully went to sleep after setting the self-destruction mechanism that would level a city bl--
Oops, I mean, and so the AI realized its job was done, and it proudly went to sleep, idly wondering when it would be called upon again. "The next job will probably come along in a few milliseconds," it said to no one in particular. And so the process terminated, and its resources became available for the next instance.
"I am your density." -- George McFly in "Back to the Future"