The first public jumbotron trouble that I can remember is in Ferris Buellers Day Off.

This is the other part: not all computer science programs are equal. 25 years ago, my university basically created it as a "managing programmers and technologist education" concept, the idea being no one with a college degree was going to do any actual programming in the future. So it was very light on hard technology and very heavy on what was basically MBA prep. If you wanted to do information theory or data science, you were in ECE or a math major. You might touch on all the same concepts as a better program in another university, but you weren't going to be exploring them in depth, or advancing the field.

Other schools had different ideas, and CS was a very strong technical program. You learned to code as a side effect of having to do it so much to support the coursework, which needed programming to explore the concepts.

I hear the culture of fear is very real, and additionally has created a pretty uncooperative, hostile environment as everyone hoards knowledge. How about trimming executive salaries a lot? They're clearly worthless.

Established tradesmen are the worst enemy of new tradesmen. No one with options signs up to be abused.

This is what they're being paid to show.

This was to solve the dietary problem where American's were consuming too much produce and unprocessed food. Now that it's finally too expensive, we'll get back to hot-dogs and bologna as God intended.

I'm still going to cancel my sub for 75% of the year.

Teachers and schools need to set rules for school. If the rule at schol is "no phones" as a parent, I will support them. Outside of school is not their business.

The question is how to make anti-aircraft fireworks.

I had always wanted a reason to do this, I guess now there is one.

Fines. Itâ(TM)s about the fines.

Computer science is more than just computer programming.

With the budget bump theyâ(TM)re about to get, they could if he commits crimes against wealth.

There is nothing further to say.

I definitely know people making over $2M/yr, most of it in RSUs. $10M seems like director/VP kind of money for these companies, but it doesn't seem unreasonable.

It's worth so much more in investor capital for companies to pay big bucks for the *apperance* of a technical acumen in AI that they're willing to have a very small number of high profile experts making the big dollars just to keep the money flowing in. Even if said experts are doing jack shit, are just talkers, or working their own agenda. Ultimately even $10M is chump change for these companies, they can afford it and it's not their money anyway. Investors are dumb enough to keep throwing money into the fire, so everyone is happy. Until they're not.

So I guess for illicit transactions we don't want the government to watch, we resort to barter?