Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Submission + - Meet the Secretive US Company Building an 'Unbreakable' Internet Inside Russia (vice.com)

An anonymous reader writes: As Russia makes preparations to possibly disconnect from the global internet in a bid to control the narrative around the invasion of Ukraine, one secretive U.S. company is rushing to lay the final pieces of an unbreakable network that the Kremlin won’t be able to take down. The company is Lantern, which says it has seen staggering growth inside Russia in the last four weeks for its app that allows users to bypass restrictions the Kremlin has put in place on platforms like Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram. But now the company is building something even more robust, an internal peer-to-peer network that will allow dissenting voices to continue to upload and share content even if the Kremlin pulls the plug on the internet.

Within the next week, the network will be fully operational, allowing opposition voices to use the Lantern app to post content like videos from protests or updates on the war in Ukraine directly to the Lantern network. This would allow users to share it with other Lantern users without fear that the content will be removed or blocked. [...] Lantern was founded in California in 2010 with the goal of keeping “the world’s information, speech, expression, and finance uncensored.” The free version of the app has a data cap of 500MB, but the pro version, which costs $32 a year, has no data cap. It has become hugely popular in China because of its ability to stay one step ahead of the government’s censorship efforts, spreading mainly via word-of-mouth as it’s not available via the Google or Apple app stores inside China. n Russia, like all new markets it enters, Lantern removed the data cap for all users. Despite this, some users still paid for the pro version.

Submission + - Nestle: Anonymous Can't Hack Us, We Leaked Our Own Data (gizmodo.com)

An anonymous reader writes: A hacker group claims to have stolen and leaked a trove of Nestle’s data. The company says that can’t possibly be true. Why? Because the data was actually leaked by Nestle itself several weeks ago. In emails to Gizmodo, a Nestle spokesperson disavowed allegations from the hacktivist collective Anonymous, which claimed this week to have stolen and leaked a 10 gigabyte tranche from the global food and beverage conglomerate. Anonymous said it was punishing Nestle for its reticence to withdraw from Russia, as a host of other major companies have done. The data, which Anonymous said included internal emails, passwords, and information on Nestle’s customers, was posted to the web on Tuesday.

But, according to Nestlé, Anonymous is full of it. A spokesperson told Gizmodo, “This recent claim of a cyber-attack against Nestle and subsequent data leak has no foundation.” The spokesperson explained that the trove of data floating around the web was, in fact, the product of a mistake the company made earlier this year: “It relates to a case from February, when some randomized and predominantly publicly available test data of a B2B nature was made accessible unintentionally online for a short period of time." [...] In a follow-up email, the same company spokesperson explained that the data, some of which was already public and some of which was not, had been accidentally published to the open internet for multiple weeks. According to the spokesperson: "Some predominantly publicly-available data (e.g., company names and company addresses and some business email addresses) was erroneously made available on the web for a limited period of time (a few weeks). It was detected by our security team at the time and the appropriate review was carried out. The data was prepared for a B2B test website to perform some functionality checks."

Comment Re:Uh huh (Score 1) 24

I don't think this is "insightful," rather, funny. It's clearly a joke, something someone would stay that failed to distinguish context. Regardless, this is a scary move. Twitter will be the new AOL (do you still have a friend with an @aol.com email address?). Twitter is talking about the "conversation layer" as activity pub in this context, not censorship. However... it's scarier.

Twitter will not gain a significant number of users with this move, it will simply prevent more people from leaving based on a promise they can tweet to their banned friends on brighteon. A promise that will take forever, that they will promote to keep from losing users. But there is something to look out for...

In the United States, Twitter is going to have big 47 U.S. Code 230 problems, and Canada now, many countries and lawsuits to follow. This is both a defensive tactic and an offensive tactic. Twitter will argue the content is shared, not controlled, they provide only an interface, and the platform irrelevant. They will argue that there are far more egregious offenders using the same protocol and they are being harassed out of political bias. (poor arguments, but they will try anything)

They are trying to keep from losing users, and ad revenue, while setting up legal arguments. They are not doing this out of the kindness in their heart and love for open platforms. And, so"

"standard for the public conversation layer of the internet." If you agree with everything we say.

Actually, very funny, but just thought it was worth pointing out the context...

United Kingdom

Submission + - Cameron Threatens To Shut Down UK Social Networks (thinq.co.uk)

Stoobalou writes: In a move worthy of China's communist regime, UK PM David Cameron wants to shut down social networks whenever civil unrest rears its head in Britain's towns and cities.

Speaking in the House of Commons, Cameron said, "Everyone watching these horrific actions will be struck by how they were, organised via social media.

"Free flow of information can be used for good. But it can also be used for ill. So we are working with the police, the intelligence services and industry to look at whether it would be right to stop people communicating via these websites and services when we know they are plotting violence, disorder and criminality."

Slashdot Top Deals

Documentation is like sex: when it is good, it is very, very good; and when it is bad, it is better than nothing. -- Dick Brandon

Working...