Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Tells? No. (Score 1) 40

The minister does not have direct legal authority to command the Alan Turing Institute to change leadership or mission.
Here's why:

The Alan Turing Institute (ATI) is an independent research organisation. It’s publicly funded, but not a government department. That means ministers like Peter Kyle can:

– set broad funding conditions
– suggest policy priorities
– threaten future funding adjustments

but they cannot legally compel the ATI to adopt a specific internal structure or research direction. The board and leadership remain independent under UK charity and corporate governance laws.

The language in Kyle’s letter, suggesting a “renewed purpose,” hinting at leadership overhaul, tying funding to strategic alignment, is political pressure, not legal command.

Unless legislation changes ATI’s founding structure or the government rewrites grant agreements to force realignment, the institute can legally ignore such instructions.
But doing so risks funding cuts, which is the real leverage here.

In short: the minister can influence with purse strings, not command by law.

Slashdot Top Deals

"Bureaucracy is the enemy of innovation." -- Mark Shepherd, former President and CEO of Texas Instruments

Working...