I'm still waiting for them to remove the volume buttons and the power button. Maybe even the power port, too.

Now, I'm joking, but in all seriousness, they could remove the power slot and resort to wireless charging only. Furthermore, they could just make the volume buttons on-screen only. As for the power button, that becomes tricky.

I'll have to look at those two links you mentioned. But posting mainly because you mentioned vacuum filters. I'm hearing that they contain fiberglass. Also, when doing the search, it brought up some sites saying they don't contain fiberglass. Now I'm confused.

https://ancillary-proxy.atarimworker.io?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.oregonlive.com%2Fcor...

https://ancillary-proxy.atarimworker.io?url=https%3A%2F%2Fannals.org%2Faim%2Ffullart... may be an interesting read.

If I recall, bright white.

While this article mentions something else, it still helps validate my point: https://ancillary-proxy.atarimworker.io?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.telegraph.co.uk%2Fne...

We should stick to halogen, not LED, in vehicles.

I'm not so sure that's the best defense. After all, if someone went through the trouble of encrypting something in the first place, do you think someone will have easily forgot the key?

Ignoring the constitutional issues at hand, would this be any different than the FBI forcing someone to hand over the key to a storage locker they suspect have illegal goods in it?

I would have thought we would have learned this by now-that growing fuel in such a manner is a bad idea.

Let's call bullying for what it is: assault and/or battery. Of course, I'm thinking of physical bullying. There's also verbal abuse, some of which can be ignored and some of which cannot be ignored. Regardless, if it happens on school grounds, the school needs to be responsible and take appropriate action.

The school needs address both parties. In other words, see why the student is bullying other students. That offender may be a "victim" of something him- or herself.

With logic like that, we might as well switch to an absolute monarchy. We as citizens must care about constitutional abuses even if it has no direct affect on a specific individual. An abuse on one is an abuse on us all. I want to say it's only a matter of time before it hits you or me, but I think it's more practical to say this: How can you feel secure when constitutional abuses are ignored? Unless you're above the law, I don't see how that's possible.

In other words, how do you enforce that people use hashtags only for what they're intended? It's not going to work. Although, they could filter them appropriately. Also, not everyone has or wants a Twitter account.

You'd think journalists having a degree means less misspellings and grammar errors.

"Maximum Homerdrive" is the episode to which I am referring. And I meant "Simpsons Did It" to be a joke from "Simpsons Already Did It" from South Park. How or why I was modded down from one to zero points is beyond me. I thought someone would get the joke.

Simpsons did it!

Maybe it's hard to tell since four to five years of college is gradual, but was the you who graduated from college much different than the you who graduated from high school? Maybe not for employment purposes, but did it help make you more wise to the world? Not counting the financial burden of college, of course.

What I'd like to see in this country (USA) is the following...
A guarantee that anyone who wants to go to college, can go to college.
Higher Direct loan caps. Maybe triple them. And I mean both subbed and unsubbed loans.
A modification of the 10 year repayment plan for Direct loans. How about zero percent interest for those who make on-time payments? Those who miss a few payments can catch up and reapply for zero percent interest.
First two years of college tuition-free, provided "good standing", for each permanent resident.
Two year grace period before loan repayment so graduates can get on their feet.
And as for graduate school, law school, medical school, we probably need student loan reform too. That way, if someone gets in on their merits, they can afford to pay for it, and not drown in interest-based debt.

I say it's awfully childish. Do we really want the Internet to be an unstable place? Because it's going to be so easy for others to retaliate, and the losers will be those who lose their rights.

If I were able to rewire an iPod to work as a teleportation device, I certainly would count that as an invention.

If it's not okay for a private citizen to do, why should it ever be okay for the government to do? I haven't read the article, so unless they mean getting a court order in order to break into someone's computer (call it what it is), then I don't see it as being okay. (I'm not Austrlian.)