Comment The reason why this spec is necessary (Score 1) 132
I agree.
By the way this flame has been generated by an error inside the broad lines of the objectwatch article.
In fact they substain that the OMG choice imply a revolution about CORBA, the choice of Java as the only CORBA language.
Of course such gigantic error has been generated by their Microsof experience.
In their experience, I presume, there isn't any difference about source compatibility and binary compatibility.
Such ipothesis is reasonable if we think that the DCOM model is limited just to the x86 windows platform.
So they assumed that using Java for binary compatibility forces the CORBA users to use only Java and this assumption is so wrong that started our fury.
Goodbye,
Antonio
By the way this flame has been generated by an error inside the broad lines of the objectwatch article.
In fact they substain that the OMG choice imply a revolution about CORBA, the choice of Java as the only CORBA language.
Of course such gigantic error has been generated by their Microsof experience.
In their experience, I presume, there isn't any difference about source compatibility and binary compatibility.
Such ipothesis is reasonable if we think that the DCOM model is limited just to the x86 windows platform.
So they assumed that using Java for binary compatibility forces the CORBA users to use only Java and this assumption is so wrong that started our fury.
Goodbye,
Antonio
