I imagine so. Itâ(TM)ll probably take place around the same time we get one frigging thread without Trump sycophants.

I never had a C64 but I still have my original Atari 1200XL, the cassette drive, an external 5.25â floppy drive, and a 32â CRT to plug it into. I even have my original BASIC cartridge and a copy of âoeMapping the Atariâ that Iâ(TM)ve been meaning to show off to my kids (now adults) for 30-ish years. I need to see if I can find original cartridges for JumpMan Jr and other games and original (still readable) diskettes of old Infocom games & one chess derivative game I used to play called Archon. That would be fun.

The conpany I work for had an approved merit increase of an average of 3.5% across ~1500 employees last year and 2.5% this year. Most people taking other jobs are looking at > 10% bumps. I recently interviewed for a job doing the same thing I do now but at a different company that is offering 30% more than I currently make. Know your worth people.

The cost of processing any of these transactions infinitesimally small. If they charge 2% of all transactions over 2000 rupees and let's just say there are a billion transactions per month over that limit (a small percentage of the total transactions processed) and they average 3000 rupees, they are making 60 billion rupees per month (nearly 700 million USD/mo). They're doing OK.

No, the next step is fares based on weight. You pay for the cost of the fuel it takes to fly you from point A to point B, plus a healthy margin.

It's already annoying to buy a lot of items online only to get the wrong item or something entirely unlike its description. Clothing is especially this way. But the more things online are produced by AI, the more people will realize the only way to have real interactions is face to face. I wouldn't be surprised if malls make a bit of a recovery because people will drop online activity once they realize it's 99% AI and they will crave in person socialization once more.

Alt+Space M is critical for moving apps that don't play nicely with changing monitor setups.

Also, I'm surprised they don't just allow it to listen in on the computer's Mic 24/7 for a wake word/phrase like "Hey, Clippy..."

Shortage?! Three movies and two series PER YEAR is too much! One movie a year maybe a shortage. Two would be plenty. But FFS, everyone I know is already burnt out on superhero movies. I would maybe be interested in one a year but more than that and Iâ(TM)m noping right out.

Of course. That's why live performances by people who can actually sing are generally way better than auto-tuned studio recordings. It's also why things like microtonality are played with in a lot of music.

We had a single POTS line for our alarm system that AT&T went from charging us $40/mo to over $1400/mo in a matter of two years until we convinced our alarm company to switch the alarm system to cellular. Crazy.

Yeah, that was a kinda dumb statement by OP. They were objectively good movies. Not perfect, but none ever are. They just got beat by better movies or ones that the voters in the academy liked more. Who cares who wins the awards? I enjoy the spectacle for its entertainment value. And, frankly, if Killers of the Flower Moon hadn't been nominated, I probably never would've watched it because I'm not a Scorsese fan, and then I would not know about the Osage or their history. Same with Rustin...probably never would've watched it, but it was very good and the lead actor was great.

Like it or not, nominations generally happen for above average films with above average acting, directing, etc. Of course, every now and then they'll thrown in a Top Gun - Maverick, which had no business being nominated even if it was entertaining. It was schlock and although I quite enjoyed it, it was 99% due to nostalgia.

OnlyFans was bad enough and damn near ruined Reddit with spam. This⦠will seal the deal. Goodbye and good riddance.

Sounds like Moon to me. The 2009 film stars Sam Rockwell and has a similar story line at least as far as I can tell from the article.

Youâ(TM)re not wrong. Iâ(TM)ve purchased a total of two Vizio TVs over the years. The first was an E601i-A3 60â 1080p LED TV for $999 over ten years ago. That TV still hangs on my living room wall and used for movies, TV shows, and sports. Still has stunning colors but is starting to show its age in the current era of âoeletâ(TM)s see how dark we can make this movieâ and has banding issues when higher res dark scenes are downsampled to 1080p. Still, I quite love that TV. The smart apps all but stopped working long ago but a Roku hooked up to it is just fine.

The second one is a more recent purchase. Itâ(TM)s a 32â Google smart cast TV we got a year or two ago for fairly cheap to put in our basement with an elliptical machine so we could pass the time better while exercising. That TV is hot garbage. I have since replaced it with a 4K TCL with Roku built in that is a great little TV.

No, no, no. Donâ(TM)t delete. Edit to gibberish. GNAA posts, time cube rants, broken english with lots of apeelling errors, incorrectly conjugation, verb mismatch plurals, popcorn new hairstyle.