Yes
One ad and all your employees can lose their heads.
Take that, Google
Systemd Rust components come out slightly larger than C with a test program being 32KB compared to 20KB for its C twin
Who's going to be able to scrounge up an extra 12KB of RAM in today's market?
It looks like if you can't beat 'em, join 'em.
Yeah, that activity was authorized. You're using "unauthorized" as if it means "unwelcome" I think, which puts you in confused banker territory.
You keep using that word in the narrow terms of a computer programmer who just finished a training course where they drilled in the technical meanings of "authorization" vs "authentication".
However, a news article for the general public is not constrained by that context. The dictionary says that "authorization" in general is permission to do something. If you prompt an AI to do one thing with your bank account, then you didn't give it permission to do something else entirely, even if it got the logon credentials to do so. It wasn't authorized by you to do the other thing.
Here's another example: It's wartime and you got drafted. Usually you're not allowed to kill people, but the government handed you a gun and you're now authorized to kill enemy soldiers. That doesn't mean that you can just shoot your comrade next to you in the trench. And you certainly can't make the claim "But I was authorized to shoot Corporal Smith. You gave me a gun, after all!"
If they're "operating inside" user's accounts, they're authorized. Does someone need to explain to banks what authorized means?
Consider a human analogy: In many cases, people give financial advisors access to one or more of their accounts so that the advisor can make trades or other transactions for the benefit of their clients. However, if an advisor suddenly starts making transactions that do not benefit the clients or are contrary to their agreed instructions, then that activity is unauthorized, even if they have login credentials.
****1/2 "Customers say that this is a great small modular nuclear reactor. They like the compact size and the fact that it's not too much power for a data center or industrial site. They especially appreciate the ease of setup and that the ultimate waste disposal question has been deferred yet again so that they don't have to worry about it. However, some customers report problems with cost overruns, vaporware, and availability of suitable fuel. Some customers note a larger terrorist attack surface per megawatt relative to full-sized reactors and question the security arrangements. There are also reports of real-world reliability problems with the novel design, with one customer reporting a catastrophic meltdown in their urban installation."
What have you got against Nazis?
Maybe use a puzzling challenge that only a real human can solve before allowing full access to your website,
"To continue to this site, please enter the value of a zero of the Reimann Zeta Function for which the real part is not equal to 1/2 and the imaginary part is not equal to zero: [ ] + i[ ]"
Of course, once astronomers have collected 120 regular stars and defeated Bowser twice, they'll unlock the 120 green stars.
I've already done this a few times.
The stock market's value was not dominated by house flippers back then.
Today, the market is largely tulips.
This is certainly the most capable vehicle ever conceived for shark jumping.
How come markets kept setting record highs since then, providing returns that have been close to ten times inflation?
Because LLMs are the new tulips.
Eight gigs and constantly swapping.
I'm not sure how every centralized version control system can be described as reinventing svn.
Indeed, it could very well be a reinvention of Visual Source Safe.
Pascal is not a high-level language. -- Steven Feiner
