Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:Not sure, we've been all electric over 2 years (Score 1) 281

but the best part about them in relation to electric vehicles is that I can fully recharge them in under 5 minutes and I get the same performance envelope throughout the usage of the stored energy. In other words, I get the same performance regardless of the amount of "charge" that is stored.

Are you aware that all modern EVs do that?

There have been some improvements in power regulation available to this market since the '70s

Comment The submission and fealty of Jeff Bezos (Score 4, Interesting) 167

Anyone remember when Trump did his first tariff spree, Amazon was going to show a tariff surcharge on its orders. So you could tell how much of the bill was due to tariffs.

Trump had a fit. Fake News! Democrat Traitors! Socialism!

Guess what Amazon did or didn't do? It would have been useful about now -- you could put in a claim for those surcharges. But do you think Bezos would risk the ire of Trump?

Comment Out of this world. Different world (Score 2) 65

When this thing was engineered, CDC 6000/7000 systems were still considered supercomputers.

Today it would take over 200,000 of those supercomputers to match what one MacMini can do.

It just shows how critical smart engineers are to an endeavor like this. I'm afraid today someone would just try to prompt it into being.

Comment Re:Not sure, we've been all electric over 2 years (Score 3, Informative) 281

I've been driving a Model Y since 2019 and I also will never go back as well. The cost calculation for me does not seem to work out quite as well as what you are reporting, but it is an improvement over ICE, mostly over maintenance issues. Not ever having to go to the gas station is a big plus all by itself.

Even if there were no economic advantage I will still go the EV route. They are just better cars. Five years in it is hard to tell my car from a new one, they are so easy to drive, no vibration and never any hassle accelerating when it is convenient to do so.

That said, if you are looking at $5-10/gal of gas you have to be thinking about it. In some parts of Europe the cost is as much as twice that.

Comment Lo-carb: not panacea (Score 4, Insightful) 69

Successful low-carb dieter here.

I would have agreed with this at some point but as my experience with nutrition grew and I got older I have a more complete understanding.

If your sole goal is to lose weight then eating nothing but meat works and it solves a lot of nutritional problems we tend to accumulate in modern living. Like fructose and high fructose corn syrup. Highly refined carbohydrates of all sorts. Trans-fats reduced to natural trace amounts. If you are on a meat-only diet you miss out on all that. You also find out that "saturated fats clog your arteries" and "salt raises your blood pressure" and yada yada all sorts of accepted wisdom is flawed at best and outright wrong.

But because people have some success on lo-carb they tend not to recognize the nutritional deficits associated with modern living lo-carb. We don't tend to eat organ meats such as kidneys and liver and brains and so on, and instead focus on muscle meats. If you ate a whole rat like a coyote you would get most of the nutrients that animal had but we don't do that and not even close. We do better with eggs and seafoods in that regard. At the end of the day you aren't eating the way your body evolved to eat.

So those nutrients you don't get from "modern" lo-carb come from other sources, including fruits, nuts, leaves. The key of course is not to exceed your calorie limit because if bodyfat is your concern the war is won or lost being able to sustain a calorie deficit or equilibrium over long term. When you get rid of most highly refined carbs in your diet you find it is much easier than you might have thought to just eat less and exercise more.

... worth what ya paid for it.

Comment Once again, so much winning (Score 5, Insightful) 24

So now can we all recognize that Pete Hegseth's little temper tantrum last month was basically just that. A spoiled little kid not getting exactly what he wants is instantly recognizable to anyone who has ever had to deal with it.

And the worst Sec Defense the nation ever had.

Comment What stops IPv6 from being universal (Score 3, Interesting) 73

Comcast is my ISP and my issues with them aside they implemented IPv6 perfectly. Back when I was running a virtual lab I could bring up any number of endpoints in the cloud and at other sites and could get 100% connectivity anywhere I wanted without dealing with any NAT complications and everything easy to account for and manageable with firewall rules.

And no bot harvester ever found a single system of mine to initiate ssh attacks on. How could they and why should they when there still are so many vulnerable IPv4 endpoints around?

I could understand back when several popular OSes didn't support IPv6 very well but that stopped being true a decade ago. Yet new deployments every day with IPv4 address only provisions.

What's it going to take to kill IPv4?

Comment The biggest winner (Score 2) 80

SpaceX

If I worked at SpaceX I would be cheering every minute of this. Science and technical issues aside the Artemis mission proved that there is political and social interest in such an endeavor to the extent that it gets funded to the ludicrous scale this one did.

They proved there is a market.

So if you come up with a usable vehicle system at 1/10th the operational cost of what people are actually paying for that is as close to a guaranteed win in a business plan it is possible to get. I wish I had stock in that company.

Comment Solved (Score 1) 314

Step 1: Fund a reliable agent. Give him or her wads of cash to pose as a 3rd world actor.

Step 2: Buy a bunch of these. $1M gets you ten so that should be enough.

Step 3, From the middle of the ocean, program them with the coordinates of the hypersonic missle factory and inventory warehouses.

Step 4. Fire. Disappear.

Step 5. CPP says no more of that.

Crisis over.

Slashdot Top Deals

"Of course power tools and alcohol don't mix. Everyone knows power tools aren't soluble in alcohol..." -- Crazy Nigel

Working...