Yes, Photography's interesting, 'cause, you know, it's-it's a new art form, and a, uh, a set of aesthetic criteria have not emerged yet.

There seem to be fewer Airbus aircraft than Boeing, so these numbers need normalising I guess...

From http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Competition_between_Airbus_and_Boeing (Deliveries summed)...

Airbus 1989-2011: 6175
Boeing 1989-2011: 9429

The original ARM designs are from 1985 (approximately). There's also an ARM OpenCore http://opencores.org/project,core_arm which I wasn't aware ARM Ltd had attempted to kill yet?

T-mobile are amazingly cheap right now. For 20GBP (I guess not far off 20USD now) I have 6 months of data access on pay as you go (i.e. I pay 20GBP and nothing else for a SIM which gives me 6 months data access). That's amazingly cheap.

not really, the Kanji largely retain their meaning between Japanese and Chinese and can be used to communicate to some extent.

oh well, I hope we see the original cables released in the next few days. The cables in general are quite readable and I'd much rather go back to the source than read an article.

Yes, but shouldn't the original cables be on wikileaks already? If wikileaks have only released the cable publically isn't that kind of against their mandate? I thought they were trying to usher in an age of "scientific journalism" where original sources could be cited.

So far this is the only reference I can find:

Where are the original cables? There seem to be a few talking about blocking/redirecting google in china. But I can't find those refering to "cyberattacks".

http://wikileaks.ch/cable/2009/05/09BEIJING1336.html

http://wikileaks.ch/cable/2009/07/09BEIJING1957.html

Or better yet could we have a like to the original cable on wikileaks?! I can't seem to find it.

Boost ( http://www.boost.org/ ) is good I also hear nice things about POCO http://pocoproject.org/

Yea. So in this case they are coming for people stealing stuff and causing damage to private property.

So erm, first they came for the people stealing peoples stuff, I did not speak because I don't like stealing other peoples stuff.

I don't see how your quote applies here.

So is this a bad idea? The usually arguments are that CCTV cameras reduce privacy and when state controlled gives more power to the state (Schneier says this is the case even if the CCTV data is generally available).

However in this case, the state isn't holding the data. It's being acquired from private sources. It doesn't appear to be aggregated. It doesn't seem like you could using it for stalking. Is there a problem here?

So it's pretty cool that ARM now have a design capable of going to 2GHz but has anyone signed up to make the silicon? The A9 design has been around for a while, but I've not seen any implementations yet.

Better:

* * * * * curl twitter.com/new299 | html2text | grep "CMD" | awk '{$1="";$0=substr($0,2)}1' | sh