Most corporations don't use GPL code
Then they aren't affected. Full stop.
Vizio fucked up big here, but the courts could fuck up big too by not recognizing how insanely important a single GPL case like this can be
This is true. So the courts shouldn't fuck up. Shouldn't need to say this as it is essentially a truism.
The GPL/AGPL are a good way to keep corporate hands off your code
It's only as good as the enforcement mechanism.
A bad ruling could destroy that
Any number of things could destroy that...bad rulings, bad enforcement, graft, political interference, ignorant or malevolent public servants, ignorant or malevolent jurors just to name a few.
For the law to work properly everything that enables it has to work properly. It's a moderately fragile system that require constant, vigilant, informed oversight to ensure justice.
Formula 1 is Deploying New Jargon for 2026
Yay! More jargon! Woohoo!
A copyright case with little impact outside the two parties?
There are a lot of corporations that are going to watch the outcome of this case very carefully as they want to continue to use open source code freely without releasing their own code to be examined and/or used by others.
There is a lot of IP riding on the outcome of this and similar decisions.
You could with some abuse of notation talk about trusting/distrusting the input and context, but there is no such notion for training data.
But a cardinal rule of reasoning is "consider the source"...and current models have no definitive models for doing so. I believe they should. Moreover, they should validate data periodically or whenever new data exists that calls into question existing data. But the models are still too simplistic to do this.
Scientists Discover People Act More Altruistic When Batman Is Present
Ooooh...now try Jesus.
Coca-Cola's New AI Holiday Ad Is a Sloppy Eyesore
"A Sloppy Eyesore" is also a pretty good description of most drinkers of Coca-Cola.
While often more truthful than some will admit, the format tends to regularly bend reporting for profits, corporate needs.
Well, since they are entertainment websites they will make the content entertaining, right? And that implies writing it with a spin. Identifying your content as humor (legally, as parody) implies this spin, makes it social commentary, and by law grants it an exemption to infringement and defamation cases.
- Frequency-complementary couplings of TENG, EMG and PENG create full-spectrum harvesters that deliver 117 % power-conversion efficiency in real waves.
So is nobody going to question the claim that this delivers 117% power-conversion efficiency? Really??
Please explain this to me, because right now my bet is this is innumeracy, ignorance or wild exaggeration.
You are an insult to my intelligence! I demand that you log off immediately.