Wireless controllers have a reliability rate SUBSTANTIALLY lower than wired controllers.

They picked carbon fibre that was past it's best by date from storage.
The "source" wasn't fine if it's cast offs. Details matter. If it were a prototype used for evaluative testing without live occupants, all good. But that's not what we're talking about here.

Have you ever actually worked with wireless electronics or protocols? Here's a hint: Bluetooth and WiFi are not protocols that should be used in any life-or-death situation. There are ways to use them, and to do so safely; this wasn't even CLOSE to that.
RF interference can come from many places, in an emergency situation a partially faulty motor can saturate RF bands and block transmissions. I've worked in environments were a failed electric motor wiped out an entire network. You can;t eliminate all risk, but you can certainly increase safety margins. Now imagine a minor failure eliminating their control system.

Not even a Google Search. Literally just talking to it before giving the toy to their children to see if, asked to talk about something harmful, it does so or refuses. Are the parents in your mind too tired to literally speak?

Uh... it even has its own Wikipedia page: women, life, freedom.

It was pretty much all over western media for a while. Before some B-stars affair, divorce or whatever became more important

According to some sources. Other sources say the opposite. I guess we need to wait and see.

Afraid that the Iranian people finally rise up against the Mullah regime? Control of communications is high on the dictatorship 101 list.

What did you expect Biden to do about the massive purges of chickens? Hatch more himself? Why is Trump getting credit for the natural recovery of the flocks? Why isn't that the proper response?

"Fraud" in Medicaid" Show it. Go ahead. Come up with REAL BILLIONS of fraud found in Medicaid. I'll wait for your sources.

You are simply dodging the original question with some made up bullshit, like MAGA always do.

Why?!

I truly find this story uninteresting after learning enough regarding decision making on the project.

The decision making was so poor they used a wireless controller as the only real controls.

They not only picked questionable materials to build it from, they picked questionable sources for that material, skipped doing any real testing of the material while ignoring legitimate concerns.

Pushing the limits is one thing, but so many of these decisions were just simply daft.

Hardwired controls with wireless for convenience; override the wireless in an emergency.

Check the sub before and after each launch, looking for material issues and documenting any changes. Not a cursory glance at it, but using equipment to actually scan the surface for defects as is used in related industries. (Ultrasonic, radio isotopes/xray, etc)

These two things alone would have increased the safety factor of this project immensely.

But ignoring them all? Boring. You made a coffin with a randomization factor

And those signs will get smaller and smaller and then disappear.

I bet right now great AI songs could fool you in an A/B test series.

If you like it, is is "trash", even if AI generated it?

Someone still made those songs. If people like them, why should it matter if they are AI or not.

People have cognitive dissonance if something they like changes to something they don't like based on whether it was based on AI, I think.

It just seems really weird to me to be like, "Oh, I like this". and then go to "Made with AI, bleh". if you learn than AI was used in creating it. You didn't even know.

Don't click on any links within a spam email.

At best is simply notifies them that the email is live. At worst, who knows?

If your mail app doesn't support marking these as spam, get a better app.

Can't see why people would want them

What new software envisions things in a way that would make these popular?

What's the killer eye app?

They have no reason to keep her from their stores, and it is specifically tied to her.

I wonder if a defamation suit would be in order?

I agree that there shouldn't be chatbots that say they are licensed therapists.

On the other hand, I see nothing wrong with people talking to AI about their problems, as long as their privacy is respected.
Of course, you are *really* putting your trust in the company for your privacy. I personally would just use a generic model, there's too much stuff going on for them to care about me in specific.

Seems to me like it's the customer's data, since they are Paying Slack. They should be able to do what they want with it, including giving it to a third party.