Let me get this straight: you're actually, for real, in favor of hidden fees, so a business can tell you that you owe them $x more than you agreed to pay for, and now you're obliged to pay?

The right-wing ones too.

That would leave everyone dumber. There are other portables with Windows that don't have the problem, showing clearly Windows isn't the problem, but rather the implementation of 3rd party drivers is. As usual.

I'm sure Christ has already returned, he was just probably deported for trying to do some construction work without a green card.

There's plenty of demand for it. The problem is cycling infrastructure doesn't exist. If I can't get from a to b using unified infrastructure then it isn't infrastructure, my safety isn't improved if the bike path ends and I'm forced to cycle on the road to make the next leg.

Now on the flip side you can look to any country that actually has developed proper end to end infrastructure that it becomes insanely heavily used. The demand is there, but there's only demand for proper solutions, not designs by politicians attempting to murder people.

Also the mRNA vaccines had been used for years in cancer research. Explain how they ended up "untested" after all of that?

I am not sure about that. LLMs cannot reason. Hence this may just be a different flavor of slop and entirely boring.

Strongly believing unverifiable things is not a sign of active intelligence. It is a sign of selective, chosen stupidity. The fundamental fault in your argument is that highly intelligent people apply that intelligence universally. Highly intelligent religious people are a nice example that demonstrates many do not. I call that "stupidity of the 2nd order" or lack of wisdom.

IMO, this is even worse than when somebody is fundamentally stupid. Such a person cannot help it. But having the skills and choosing to not apply them is utterly pathetic.

And does so about pretty fundamental questions? Yes, checks out. How repulsive.

Ok well if they are testing it all and know what they are doing then no one will be killed by accident and this article is a moot point.

Please link me to the evidence that it is vaccines causing this. I'm sure you have omitted all the other possible causes like pollution exposure and an aging population? What about the fact that having COVID itself raises the possibility of a heart attack?

Politicians are supposed to consult with people who are experts and not make the decisions themselves. Nothing has changed there.

I can't say I really understand your comment. What is meant by "the border is secure"? It doesn't matter whether the left or right media tells me that because that's only the beginning of the job for media. The obvious question is, what numbers or studies are leading to the conclusion that the border is secure. The real job of the media is to report on the numbers and allow people to do what they want with them and decide whether they agree with them. Unfortunately some people believe the media on the surface because they don't understand the numbers anyway and that's where problems arise.

So expert consensus is as important as listening to experts. I don't think anyone is refuting this.

The problem is that it is not realistic to expect everyone to dig out information from a mountain of bullshit. Awaiting for this to happen is demonstrably making everyone's life worse.