And I still have no idea what you are trying to say.
Maybe instead of getting angry, you could just...clarify what you are trying to say.
And I still have no idea what you are trying to say.
Maybe instead of getting angry, you could just...clarify what you are trying to say.
You have not seen me angry. You just might be projecting a bit. That's a you problem.
I'll make my point as if I'm speaking to a child.
A continent is a big area on the earth
Some people living on one of the continents are upset. Africa is that continent.
Some say that the map used by most countries is really bad. They are mad about that.
They say that a change is needed, and needed right now!
Why are they mad?
They are mad because the continent they live on should be larger on the map. They say this is harmful and hurts children
How do we help them? We don't want children hurt.
they want a special map that they say doesn't hurt children because it makes their continent look bigger.
They want everyone in the world to use the map that doesn't hurt their children.
But there is a problem
Earth is a big ball
But people want maps on paper so they do not need to carry big balls around with maps on them.
There are many ways to make flat maps from a ball, but none are correct. All will make some places look funny and wrong.
Discussion - Is there a map that is right?
Discussion - Do maps hurt children? They say yes it does.
Discussion - There are many types of Maps - are they forced to use maps that they think hurts children?
Ima shift into grownup language now. So you can stop reading here if you are still confused. No flat map will be right. So arguing about what flat map is best or most accurate is like having an argument about who is the worlds tallest midget.... eerrm little person.
Now you might wonder what I use. A couple things. On my wall in my office I have a Mercator projection map. It is used as a reference for pushpins, and not for a moment as some determinant of continent size. Nothing is measured on it. That would be inaccurate and not very smart. The same would be true no matter what projections I used.
When I need distances, and directions, I use a computer program. It looks at the world as a sphere. And it calculates distances and azimuths in a manner that do not translate to a flat map very well. If I need the shortest distance and azimuth between some place in the US to another place in say Russia, it takes me over the North Pole, not what a flat map projection would expect. Tells me all the details I need. And while there are projections that might mitigate that to some extent, they are difficult to use, and if a Mercator projection is bad, those can be almost unreadable. For my purposes, there isn't a good flat map, only ones that are readable.
If you still can't understand - there is no solution for an accurate flat map, so pick a lane, and don't act like your a favorite map won or lost. All flat maps derived from a globe have various degrees of fail.
If you still really can't understand that, that's a you problem.