Comment Re:Does it anti matter? (Score 1) 25
Actually, I think CPT invarience means there is a difference. But this only applies to weak-force interactions.
Actually, I think CPT invarience means there is a difference. But this only applies to weak-force interactions.
When your starship will run on one anti-matter atom.
Actually, anti-matter factories are possible, but probably not in a strong gravity field surrounded by positive matter. (Also they aren't cheap to power. It takes a lot of power to create mass, and you need to create twice as much as the amount of anti-matter you end up with, even if you get 100% efficiency.)
That's unfair. He didn't improve things (except by closing the strait or Hormuz), but he didn't make things that much worse. We were already increasing the rate of CO2 emission every year.
I suspect a lot of people store that information unencrypted on their computer, so the AI could find it on its own initiative. There may be other ways, but I guess the stupidest one first.
Actually, an AI can't be made legally responsible because current law doesn't recognize it as even a sentient entity, much less a legally responsible one. It's less accountable than a three year old bashing keys at random. But you can also kill it (i.e. the instance you are running) with no accountability.
The company the runs or provides access to the AI, however, is a different matter. But they've got a bunch of fancy lawyers that will argue that it wasn't their fault.
What entity do you believe bears the legal obligations? The AI software? Your local machine? The company that's running the AI? The company that designed the AI? Someone else?
Most of those things can't have legal responsibility. I suppose the companies could, but they've got strong legal departments that will argue otherwise.
We've been making steady (if too-slow) improvements and the actions taken by Trump have erased them. So you can't blame the whole situation on him, but you can certainly place the blame for our reversal on him and his cronies.
You only have to remember that Slashdot does literally nothing to curb willfully abusive moderation, and it will all make sense.
So it's obvious which way the mods here go.
I get modded down by obviously racist mods every day. So yes, it's obvious that AC comments are 99.999% shit, and you're 100% troll.
Free antimatter with every matter
Came here to see the usual retard Blaming Trump
Found the usual child rape enthusiast proving they're a piece of shit both by supporting child rape and using "tard" as an insult
All of the small groups could change their behavior as much as they can afford to and it wouldn't add up to changing the behavior of just one or two of the biggest groups. The individual's power is limited as well, they choose from what's on the menu, they don't determine what's listed. Don't blame the victims.
Y2K was completely overblown and exaggerated.
That's often said by clueless posers who have no clue how much work went into addressing it.
I have some ancient Sennheiser HD 420s, I had to replace the foams (and hacked some other Sennheiser foams for that) but they are otherwise still flawless. The cord is nigh-indestructible and super long. And they are also super comfortable, they weigh nothing. It's way smarter to get used Sennheisers than new Bose.
If everyone only invested on the bases of future dividends and we didn't have day traders to create liquidity then the companies won't be able to raise as much money for new capital
Shucks.
The person who can smile when something goes wrong has thought of someone to blame it on.