Compare MetaAccess vs. ThreatLocker

Security teams are increasingly challenged by the rise of remote work, struggling with limited visibility and control over the devices connecting to their networks and their security status. Compounding this issue is the need for numerous point solutions to achieve adequate oversight and management. MetaAccess offers a comprehensive solution by providing secure network access and thorough endpoint compliance in one unified platform. This streamlined approach significantly eases ongoing management tasks, ultimately minimizing time, effort, and notably, risk. Cybersecurity threats like Advanced Persistent Threats and Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) attacks pose serious risks, especially to remote employees, highlighting the necessity for more robust solutions than traditional VPNs. The Software Defined Perimeter (SDP) enhances security while avoiding the cost and performance drawbacks often associated with VPNs, offering a superior user experience that meets the demands of today’s remote workforce. By adopting SDP, organizations can safeguard their networks more effectively while accommodating the flexibility required by modern work environments.

ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform provides extensive application control with features like ring-fencing and selective elevation, ensuring meticulous execution management. Offering learning mode and extensive support, it integrates threat detection and activity monitoring to enhance compliance, reduce costs, and bolster cybersecurity through alerts and approvals. Despite its strengths, there are areas for improvement in training flexibility, policy updates, and interface enhancements, along with challenges in handling non-digitally signed software. Deployed across environments, it works well with existing cybersecurity instruments for real-time threat prevention.