VMS is slower than OpenBSD on a comparable system? I haven't tried OpenBSD on Alpha but if you have run OpenBSD/alpha and OpenVMS on the same or similar Alpha server then well done sir, and do you have any metrics to show us?
The problem I have with your statement comparing (default) filesystem for each OS is that they have quite different feature-sets, for instance VMS has file-versioning, and quite extensive access control and access auditing capability. Bash is a very lightweight and simple shell that relies on a lot of (admittedly) standard Unix tools (such as grep, awk, sed, etc) to make it useful. DCL on the other hand has a significant payload of lexical functions. VMS has a batch and printer control system that is leaves unix job and print control way behind, VMS is more akin to a traditional mainframe in that respect. So don't get me wrong, I'm not knocking OpenBSD (I'm a great fan of the secure-by-default nature of OpenBSD) but I just don't believe one can easily compare it to OpenVMS...